@nadjarostowa said in #6:
I guess you can argue that way from a theoretical (puzzle-mining) perspective. From the user's side, the puzzle is correct, as the opponent is by no means forced to pick one defense over another.
If you get the puzzle in the training mix, it is fine. But those who specifically look for a mate in three (https://lichess.org/training/mateIn3) could be rather frustrated by it.
BTW, this puzzle has been discussed before: https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/puzzle-needs-removal-from-mate-in-3-section.
@nadjarostowa said in #6:
> I guess you can argue that way from a theoretical (puzzle-mining) perspective. From the user's side, the puzzle is correct, as the opponent is by no means forced to pick one defense over another.
If you get the puzzle in the training mix, it is fine. But those who specifically look for a mate in three (https://lichess.org/training/mateIn3) could be rather frustrated by it.
BTW, this puzzle has been discussed before: https://lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/puzzle-needs-removal-from-mate-in-3-section.