And I thought my study on the Greco Gambit had a large chapter...
And I thought my study on the Greco Gambit had a large chapter...
And I thought my study on the Greco Gambit had a large chapter...
@thibault said in #8:
As #1 said, there has to be "SOME cap".
For most players 1,000 moves is more than enough. #1 wants 9,000. Others used more than 20,000 nodes, before a cap was set.
The cap is now set, to 3,000. And it will stay as is.
I don't care about 9,000 specifically. Pigeonholing my post into "wants some exact, arbitrary number" just means you don't get it - or you're being disingenuous, both suck. What I want is enough latitude to do (serious) theoretical opening studies. Your site doesn't allow enough moves to do that in a reasonable or clean-looking manner. I guess that's just one more (utterly basic) feature that your site won't have, now - I say that assuming someone who wants to throw their weight around in such an embarrassing king-of-the-internet way is also the sort who can't change their mind even when they're plainly wrong. Like, did you wake up with a back ache when you wrote this?
Feel free to leave "the most useless fucking site on the face of planet Earth"
https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rare-opening-question#7
this man putting every possible game of chess in his study
@thibault said in #13:
Feel free to leave "the most useless fucking site on the face of planet Earth"
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rare-opening-question#7
This sounds extremely dumb but
Thibault, please no cursing
Yes please.
So this is what it feels to have an 1800 insulting a chess site..
@turbojerboa said in #12:
@thibault said in #8:
As #1 said, there has to be "SOME cap".
For most players 1,000 moves is more than enough. #1 wants 9,000. Others used more than 20,000 nodes, before a cap was set.
The cap is now set, to 3,000. And it will stay as is.
I don't care about 9,000 specifically. Pigeonholing my post into "wants some exact, arbitrary number" just means you don't get it - or you're being disingenuous, both suck. What I want is enough latitude to do (serious) theoretical opening studies. Your site doesn't allow enough moves to do that in a reasonable or clean-looking manner. I guess that's just one more (utterly basic) feature that your site won't have, now - I say that assuming someone who wants to throw their weight around in such an embarrassing king-of-the-internet way is also the sort who can't change their mind even when they're plainly wrong. Like, did you wake up with a back ache when you wrote this?
Thibault is not "plainly wrong". There's a reason on why there are those limits. You have to understand that this is a public site and limits are set to prevent abuse from malicious users.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.