i played a classical game and analysed on both of this websites.I saw that chess.com says u just made 2 blunders,3 mistakes,4 inaccuracies but lichess says that i have 5 blunders 4 mistakes 2 inaccuracies. i wonder which website's analysis is better.
(i am not trying to advertise chess.com)
i played a classical game and analysed on both of this websites.I saw that chess.com says u just made 2 blunders,3 mistakes,4 inaccuracies but lichess says that i have 5 blunders 4 mistakes 2 inaccuracies. i wonder which website's analysis is better.
(i am not trying to advertise chess.com)
If you want to learn to get better at chess why would the labels make any difference?
Better for what purpose?
If you want to learn to get better at chess why would the labels make any difference?
Better for what purpose?
i just want to understand the difference between these 2 websites' analysis
i just want to understand the difference between these 2 websites' analysis
Lichess is stronger, since their engine is better.
Lichess is stronger, since their engine is better.
Yeah better than Komodo or whatever chess.com uses
Yeah better than Komodo or whatever chess.com uses
Lichess' analysis is better than Chesscom's, since it has the stronger engine.
Also, the way that Lichess and Chesscom determine what counts as a blunder, mistake, etc. are completely different from each other, so there isn't really way to compare those.
Either way, if either computer says your move was bad, the computer is most likely right.
Lichess' analysis is better than Chesscom's, since it has the stronger engine.
Also, the way that Lichess and Chesscom determine what counts as a blunder, mistake, etc. are completely different from each other, so there isn't really way to compare those.
Either way, if either computer says your move was bad, the computer is most likely right.