Computer analysis doesnt make sense sometimes. • page 1/1 • Lichess Feedback • lichess.org

I dont know which board would be appropriate for this topic, so i post it on both boards. My recent game is here

http://lichess.org/analyse/21v51lwf/black

If u see f5 on move 36 by black , analysis says its a blunder. It claims the best move is e1e5. does that make sense considering ,Qf2 by white on step 37 would be a check mate against black, had i not moved the f pawn.
I don't understand computer analysis.

I dont know which board would be appropriate for this topic, so i post it on both boards. My recent game is here >> http://lichess.org/analyse/21v51lwf/black If u see f5 on move 36 by black , analysis says its a blunder. It claims the best move is e1e5. does that make sense considering ,Qf2 by white on step 37 would be a check mate against black, had i not moved the f pawn. I don't understand computer analysis.

Cynosure

#2

By moving the f pawn, you allow White's queen to take your b7 pawn, preventing Blacks king from going to g7 and escaping checkmate. If White's queen had taken your b7 pawn, there is an unescapable checkmate sequence regardless of your moves. The computer recommends you take with your queen, as if white had taken b7, you could have prevented checkmate with e7 or similar. That's what I saw, anyway.

sabari18

#3

and some1 cleared me abt the check black queen makes capturing e5. So i got no confusion now.computer is always the best n i got bad eye for mistakes lol. thanks to clearin me up abt aftermath.