- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Bug with the Analysis tool

Hello,

I attempted to analyse this game yesterday: http://fr.lichess.org/uqK6xf9V
But as you can see, it seems that nothing happened actually (no evaluation, checkmate in 2, 0 blunder/mistake/inaccuracy)

Is there a bug somewhere?

Thanks!

Hello, I attempted to analyse this game yesterday: http://fr.lichess.org/uqK6xf9V But as you can see, it seems that nothing happened actually (no evaluation, checkmate in 2, 0 blunder/mistake/inaccuracy) Is there a bug somewhere? Thanks!

Yes, a few analysis were failed yesterday. It's been sorted.

Yes, a few analysis were failed yesterday. It's been sorted.

Got a pretty bad analysis this morning. Is it possible there is something still broken? http://en.lichess.org/1BlRBIla/black#19

This move is called a mistake, and then it suggests several bizarre moves for black, esp a rook sacrifice followed by a queen sacrifice...

Am I missing something? Those recommendations by the analyzer look really wrong.

Got a pretty bad analysis this morning. Is it possible there is something still broken? http://en.lichess.org/1BlRBIla/black#19 This move is called a mistake, and then it suggests several bizarre moves for black, esp a rook sacrifice followed by a queen sacrifice... Am I missing something? Those recommendations by the analyzer look really wrong.

ok so the rook move was because of the threatened fork. but the queen move? i don't know. sorry. nevermind

ok so the rook move was because of the threatened fork. but the queen move? i don't know. sorry. nevermind

The deeper you go down into the suggested analysis, the crazier it gets. It's only able to see accuracy with depth relative to the current move with the small amount of time it uses to analyse each move. The suggested 17. ...Qb5 is definitely a very, very bad move, but not one it would suggest the closer you actually got to it. It's actually fairly normal to see crazy things like that further down the suggested line.

The deeper you go down into the suggested analysis, the crazier it gets. It's only able to see accuracy with depth relative to the current move with the small amount of time it uses to analyse each move. The suggested 17. ...Qb5 is definitely a very, very bad move, but not one it would suggest the closer you actually got to it. It's actually fairly normal to see crazy things like that further down the suggested line.

Hello, looking at the suggested line here http://tr.lichess.org/KZ9cP0bZ#26 starting with c5... things get really wierd with h3 and Be2 and so on. I mean I understand that as you go deeper in the line (#5) it is supposed to get less rigorios but I have never realised this much of a disparity in my previous analyses, has something changed in the code recently? (was feeling pretty good about my last games, would be a terrible let down if it was placebo :p) Note: Just an idea, is it possible that with increasing number of lichessers and quasi-static size of servers, are we getting less and less accuracy from the analysis ?

Hello, looking at the suggested line here http://tr.lichess.org/KZ9cP0bZ#26 starting with c5... things get really wierd with h3 and Be2 and so on. I mean I understand that as you go deeper in the line (#5) it is supposed to get less rigorios but I have never realised this much of a disparity in my previous analyses, has something changed in the code recently? (was feeling pretty good about my last games, would be a terrible let down if it was placebo :p) Note: Just an idea, is it possible that with increasing number of lichessers and quasi-static size of servers, are we getting less and less accuracy from the analysis ?

Similar problem in my game: http://pl.lichess.org/tKfN5ehu/black#53
The last move from analyze is just loosing whole rook for a pawn...

Similar problem in my game: http://pl.lichess.org/tKfN5ehu/black#53 The last move from analyze is just loosing whole rook for a pawn...

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.