With advanced search and filters i get 23 classical rated games:
http://en.lichess.org/@/kettwiesel/search?perf=3&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc
and i count 15 out of the 23 rated classical games are with computer analysis.
First Bug:
With advanced search and filters i only get 6 rated classical analysed games:
http://en.lichess.org/@/kettwiesel/search?perf=3&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc&analysed=1
Second Bug:
-> and i guess first bug influence that Chess Insights does not resognice all my 15 analysed classical games:
http://en.lichess.org/insights/kettwiesel/acpl/variant
(only 294 moves are taken for Classical variant stats, but the 15 analysed rated classical games are about 600 moves)
With advanced search and filters i get 23 classical rated games:
http://en.lichess.org/@/kettwiesel/search?perf=3&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc
and i count 15 out of the 23 rated classical games are with computer analysis.
First Bug:
With advanced search and filters i only get 6 rated classical analysed games:
http://en.lichess.org/@/kettwiesel/search?perf=3&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc&analysed=1
Second Bug:
-> and i guess first bug influence that Chess Insights does not resognice all my 15 analysed classical games:
http://en.lichess.org/insights/kettwiesel/acpl/variant
(only 294 moves are taken for Classical variant stats, but the 15 analysed rated classical games are about 600 moves)
Same issue , other player:
http://en.lichess.org/@/dnowchess/search?perf=4&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc&analysed=1
Shows currently only one rated, analysed correspondence game, but he has 4 rated, analysed correspondence games.
Only 1 analysed correspondence game (with 39 moves) is resogniced by Chess Insights Correspondence acpl :
http://en.lichess.org/insights/dnowchess/acpl/variant
Wrong numbers drive me nuts, such statistics reminds me the faked german unemployment rate ;-)
Same issue , other player:
http://en.lichess.org/@/dnowchess/search?perf=4&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc&analysed=1
Shows currently only one rated, analysed correspondence game, but he has 4 rated, analysed correspondence games.
Only 1 analysed correspondence game (with 39 moves) is resogniced by Chess Insights Correspondence acpl :
http://en.lichess.org/insights/dnowchess/acpl/variant
Wrong numbers drive me nuts, such statistics reminds me the faked german unemployment rate ;-)
same here:
http://en.lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/chess-insights-dont-take-into-account-all-my-analysed-games
Currently he played 19 ratet analysed bullet games, but advanced search can only find 12:
http://en.lichess.org/@/Dirty_Thirty_Seconds/search?perf=1&mode=1&sort.field=d&sort.order=desc&analysed=1
only 250 moves are resogniced:
http://en.lichess.org/insights/Dirty_Thirty_Seconds/acpl/variant
Can anybody give me a hint (link to source code functions) where i can start to investigate this advanced search bug?
Advanced search seems to be deeply broken. It gives different results for the same query sometimes. Returns 0 games when I know there should be 20-30 games. Doesn't find some opponents I've played but does find others.
It's almost useless as it stands, which is too bad. Would be a very useful feature if it worked.
Advanced search seems to be deeply broken. It gives different results for the same query sometimes. Returns 0 games when I know there should be 20-30 games. Doesn't find some opponents I've played but does find others.
It's almost useless as it stands, which is too bad. Would be a very useful feature if it worked.