@viktheking said in #8:
> 1. What is F6, E4? It's f6, e4.
> 2. Use actual notation. The move is Nc6.
> 3. In what world is +0.6 'losing'? I guarantee you have lost 50% of your games when you were +0.6.
> 4. 'The pressure'? I have a >50% winrate playing the Alekhine and hundreds of games. Why would I blunder mate because of 'pressure'? I blundered because I suck at chess. Would you say the same thing if I made such blunders in the French or Sicilian?
> 5. You play the Pirc. You have a 46% winrate with it, while I have a 52% winrate with my Alekhine. Arguably, winrate is much more important than the Stockfish evaluation, so if we use this logic, Alekhine>Pirc. (Even in the entire Lichess database, the Alekhine scores a tad more than the Pirc and has the highest win rate of all the openings, tied with the Caro-Kann.)
>
> If you really think that the Alekhine Defense is a blunder, you shouldn't be playing a hypermodern opening. Surely by now you understand that White having a large center is a double-edged sword. I didn't want to turn a light thread about my blundering into an opening argument.
Then why do I see this:
> ...clown.
Namecalling definitely starts an argument, as well as points involving winrate and simple writing differences.