lichess.org
Donate

Kingscrusher should be banned

Fair enough, I retract my statement and apologize to IMadirtycheater and his whole family. (See how easy that was KC)?
I don't have anything to say, I just want to be able to tell my grandchildren I posted in this thread when they ask me about it in 40 years.
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ Let's get the popcorn kids ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ
KC you said:

IsolatedPun-Youtube :
You won't be happy if Amadan does a dual commentary match then?! Seriously I can arrange a prize for him if we have such a match and don't expect any prize in return if I win the match.
Is he chicken for such a dual commentary match?!

KC, that is nothing what I said. Stop putting words in my mouth. Answer Post 65 properly like I asked u too, and stop avoiding that post.

(I can help you with the captcha if your stuck)

Accusing someone of cheating when their very best games are 20 centipawn loss is pretty low. Sure, it's hyperbullet, and you might expect a bit higher, but in games where you hang a piece in 15 moves I wouldn't even be suspicious of someone below 5 centipawn loss. I've had 10 minute games with less than 5 centipawn loss myself where the game quickly simplified into a draw.

Also, Amadan seems to be known by many chess players, and I have heard from some people that they have frequently seen him on chessbrah's stream, so in my personal opinion, there is absolutely no doubt that kingscrusher is in the wrong. Not to mention that shaming someone on a public channel that many people people are watching and linked to from the front page here is pretty terrible, and in no way just a "private stream".

Also, to accuse someone of cheating from the opening they play is absolutely the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
This is clearly an attack thread on Kingscrusher. All the lichess trolls are jumping in attacking Kingscrushers trying to act cool. it's pathetic. I think Amadan has been reported by several people for cheating. I think now it's best to leave it to the mods to check and see if he did cheat.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.