@Mizar Ok I'll bite
The thing about science is that it works like this:
Scientist1: Here is a theory/model of how I think certain things happen, that I invented. Anybody has a better one?
Scientist2: I have this much more complicated theory about that thing that also explains/models what we see
All/Majority of Scientists: Ok guys, you might both be right. For the time being we accept the first one as a working theory (Occam Razor-ish) and keep expanding it and building on top of it to see if it might be useful in explaining other things we see and have no theory about right now as well. Of course dear Person2, feel free to work on yours as well. Maybe it will show to be better at eventually explaining more things that we don't understand
It is not about finding ultimate truths etc. It is a process of investigation and modelling the natural world (of course some scientists might find motivation in the ideal hope to some day find some ultimate truth).
Since you probably want to steer the conversation into a theological one. Try developing a theory based on the bible or whatever and then see if it looks simpler and if it explains more natural phenomenons than the existing "working theory". And to steer away from such discussion - I see absolutely no contradiction between science and religion and i am honestly baffled why this conversation even exists