Is there a way to punish the wing gambit response to Sicilian? I'm thinking in particular of the sequence:
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. b4?
It's annoying but looks like there ought to be a clear refutation. Ideally a reply would humiliate the opponent to the point where they abandon chess for life. However, I'll settle for anything leaving Black with a distinct advantage.
3....Nxb4 looks enticing because black takes the free pawn without screwing up the pawn structure or diverting the c pawn from the centre. But I find the displacement of the N and lag in development ends up having a price. I'm aware that the recommended reply is 3....d5, 4. exd5 Qxd5, but it seems to produce very sharp lines with no distinct advantage. Anyone experienced with this variation?
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. b4?
It's annoying but looks like there ought to be a clear refutation. Ideally a reply would humiliate the opponent to the point where they abandon chess for life. However, I'll settle for anything leaving Black with a distinct advantage.
3....Nxb4 looks enticing because black takes the free pawn without screwing up the pawn structure or diverting the c pawn from the centre. But I find the displacement of the N and lag in development ends up having a price. I'm aware that the recommended reply is 3....d5, 4. exd5 Qxd5, but it seems to produce very sharp lines with no distinct advantage. Anyone experienced with this variation?