newb looks like some kind of performance artist! what patience to lose 130 times -- intentionally, often on repeated games like this dump: lichess.org/analyse/1lm77cuq
I'm afraid he lose his time, because I closed his account.
I don't think newb was cheating, maybe just a good player posing as bad to ambush people.
i think swsx999 is still cheating... someone needs to verify
@karifal
probably you are talking about the game lichess.org/analyse/6ejgrt01/black
Ok, 16.b4 it's really a great move, difficult to spot it!
But why you didn't take the knight at 19?
You can drive your queen at c3 or c5 if she has troubles with rooks.
probably you are talking about the game lichess.org/analyse/6ejgrt01/black
Ok, 16.b4 it's really a great move, difficult to spot it!
But why you didn't take the knight at 19?
You can drive your queen at c3 or c5 if she has troubles with rooks.
@demomaster
if i take the knight 19...axNb5 then i saw 20.Ra1 and now if 20...Qc3 i lose a rook by 21. Qxc3
if i take the knight 19...axNb5 then i saw 20.Ra1 and now if 20...Qc3 i lose a rook by 21. Qxc3
@karifal
oops!!! you are right!!! my bad!
oops!!! you are right!!! my bad!
and the problem i got with this game is the move 25.Nh5+ instead of 25.Nxd7+ (taking the queen).
25.Nh5+ is a very suspicious move
25.Nh5+ is a very suspicious move
hmm... I don't know the remaining time and I don't know if he was under pressure.
If he wasn't, probably he knew that the game was to win and he just tried to find a quick conclusion, and in fact he found checkmate in 2 moves. Two moves aren't many enough to not see the checkmate.
It's just a thought.
I like your games! Strong player!
If he wasn't, probably he knew that the game was to win and he just tried to find a quick conclusion, and in fact he found checkmate in 2 moves. Two moves aren't many enough to not see the checkmate.
It's just a thought.
I like your games! Strong player!
In the aforementioned game, 25. Nh5+ is a very, very, VERY suspicious move for someone ranked in the 1100's. lol
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.