@justthere
Yes, you said it quoting me: "Vishy had decency". He had and he has. One thing is to be angry and being sarcastic -this also can be found in many strong GMs- but on the other hand, leaving the press conference due a clear loose.
Yes, indeed. Interviews are ridiculous once Magnus Carlsen loose a game and establishes S. Karjakin -by the time being- as winner.
Childish behaviour for a WCC; so, it'd be interesting to see Karjakin as WCC, at least, he is a gentleman even when "he's at the foot of the canyon" or played terrible chess.
Moreover, you're trying to head off the conversation with appointment fallacies like "now i see how you place your opinions", which is very interesting to underline, because your chess skills are low, poor and despite everything, you think you have the authority to show everyone -even to a GM, like me- how Magnus is, how "history legends" are..., and other irrelevant and idealistics thoughts about chess, when chess is a game and a science purely objective.
"its obviously a REALITY SHOW" this shows me you are a young enough and you do not have minimum knowledge about chess history. A press conference, an interview or even an analysis usually was shared by the aspirant and the champion for a long time, so it remained at the same time chess was growing. The above shows "the nearest face" of two of the strongest chess player in a determined time.
Firstly, I recommend you to learn how to avoid a checkmate before talking superior things to you:
es.lichess.org/z3eN7O7L/black#2
Yes, you said it quoting me: "Vishy had decency". He had and he has. One thing is to be angry and being sarcastic -this also can be found in many strong GMs- but on the other hand, leaving the press conference due a clear loose.
Yes, indeed. Interviews are ridiculous once Magnus Carlsen loose a game and establishes S. Karjakin -by the time being- as winner.
Childish behaviour for a WCC; so, it'd be interesting to see Karjakin as WCC, at least, he is a gentleman even when "he's at the foot of the canyon" or played terrible chess.
Moreover, you're trying to head off the conversation with appointment fallacies like "now i see how you place your opinions", which is very interesting to underline, because your chess skills are low, poor and despite everything, you think you have the authority to show everyone -even to a GM, like me- how Magnus is, how "history legends" are..., and other irrelevant and idealistics thoughts about chess, when chess is a game and a science purely objective.
"its obviously a REALITY SHOW" this shows me you are a young enough and you do not have minimum knowledge about chess history. A press conference, an interview or even an analysis usually was shared by the aspirant and the champion for a long time, so it remained at the same time chess was growing. The above shows "the nearest face" of two of the strongest chess player in a determined time.
Firstly, I recommend you to learn how to avoid a checkmate before talking superior things to you:
es.lichess.org/z3eN7O7L/black#2