@IPunishDaddy2007 Even grandmasters have been beaten in less. As you are a million light years away from being any personality at all you might get mated in 5 moves.
@OnlyBetterNoBlitz It's impossible to beat me in 30 moves unless it was like a thematic tournament and I was forced to play something dodgy in a fast time control. Getting a provably winning position is doable, and I bet the very best players or engines would have a pretty good chance of achieving that at least SOME Of the time but actually getting mate onto the board in less than 30 moves by each player isn't doable.
@mysterious_expert No way you get classical #1. Number 1 is 2660!!
@IPunishDaddy2007 it takes me only 2 moves to mate you
@IPunishDaddy2007 @OnlyBetterNoBlitz please don't fill this forum with these useless arguments that will not solve anything. If you guys need to argue more, do it in private messages!
@LiamPutnam2008 I think I can do it. Of course not in a month, that would be crazy, but a longer time period. Plus, the current #1 only plays like one game per month.
@LiamPutnam2008 I think I can do it. Of course not in a month, that would be crazy, but a longer time period. Plus, the current #1 only plays like one game per month.
@IPunishDaddy2007 #8, Bd2 is theory. You can look it up. Nbd2 as I explained, would block the bishop.
Yo you guys are top rated players
@mysterious_expert Nbd2 is an improvement over Bd2. the bishop is MUCH BETTER on c1 in the given position and doesn't remain blocked. If it will develop to d2 it must do so at the opportune moment. I'm gonna hit you with some chess wisdom and let you know that the threat is often more powerful than the execution.
@IPunishDaddy2007 give me a little chess wisdom? oh, please. All of the top chess players in the world play Bd2, go argue with them if you think that you are always right and always the best.
@IPunishDaddy2007 you know nothing about chess.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.