- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Priyomes

#11

A button on Lichess to add a position with a flashcard (and option to add commentary) with spaced repetition etc, would be an AMAZING new feature on Lichess that would set it apart from the competition.

A button on Lichess to add a position with a flashcard (and option to add commentary) with spaced repetition etc, would be an AMAZING new feature on Lichess that would set it apart from the competition.
#12

@petri999 said in #10:

That is not what intuition is. It based on learning. Intuition is automated memory. After doing thousands of times something the important thing is fetched without upper layers of brain engaging. It is not learning from the books or so but learned anyway.

I am not sure one can limit intuition of low level reflex learning. That is the woopecker premise maybe.

The perception and evaluation of a complex position is also involved. Even the definition by example of chess books, what the authors come up with is hiding a lot of intuition itself, and might be dependent on experience.

pattern recognition is intuition.. But I think reading from books or discussing with other chess players (the same thing, synchronous), about emerginjg concepts of the board, can help pay attention upon ones experience to what will feed the intuition learning process... either by helping the steering of games into where to look for new stuff, or in the more known territory paying more attention to what was more mechanical play before.

It may require a bit more divergent thinking for the theory considered to talk to the intuition or vice-versa or even a constant or reccurrent (more precie) dialog..

I consider myself very intuitive in the context of mathematics and even reasoning. I do not see the big divide that you seem to propose. I like to say intuition proposes, and logic disposes. But I think for the learning aspect (not the performance) logic re-proposes to the intuition as well. or the conscious rational (logic is energivore, implemented on a statistical brain).

@petri999 said in #10: > That is not what intuition is. It based on learning. Intuition is automated memory. After doing thousands of times something the important thing is fetched without upper layers of brain engaging. It is not learning from the books or so but learned anyway. I am not sure one can limit intuition of low level reflex learning. That is the woopecker premise maybe. The perception and evaluation of a complex position is also involved. Even the definition by example of chess books, what the authors come up with is hiding a lot of intuition itself, and might be dependent on experience. pattern recognition is intuition.. But I think reading from books or discussing with other chess players (the same thing, synchronous), about emerginjg concepts of the board, can help pay attention upon ones experience to what will feed the intuition learning process... either by helping the steering of games into where to look for new stuff, or in the more known territory paying more attention to what was more mechanical play before. It may require a bit more divergent thinking for the theory considered to talk to the intuition or vice-versa or even a constant or reccurrent (more precie) dialog.. I consider myself very intuitive in the context of mathematics and even reasoning. I do not see the big divide that you seem to propose. I like to say intuition proposes, and logic disposes. But I think for the learning aspect (not the performance) logic re-proposes to the intuition as well. or the conscious rational (logic is energivore, implemented on a statistical brain).
#13

well starts to be off topic. One more annoying research assistants back when was still in uni. Saw difficult integration problem and in about few seconds: This can be divided into bessel function and easily integratable part. THe fact that he saw it was very automated from excessive amount training and verifying and seeing to end is analytical.

well starts to be off topic. One more annoying research assistants back when was still in uni. Saw difficult integration problem and in about few seconds: This can be divided into bessel function and easily integratable part. THe fact that he saw it was very automated from excessive amount training and verifying and seeing to end is analytical.
#14

@petri999 said in #13:

Intuition in chess: a study with world-class players
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00426-023-01823-x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497664/
Psychol Res. 2023; 87(8): 2380–2389. Published online 2023 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01823-x

Thank you op, for this little detour. (but it lurks behind the chess words).

@petri999 said in #13: > Intuition in chess: a study with world-class players https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00426-023-01823-x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497664/ Psychol Res. 2023; 87(8): 2380–2389. Published online 2023 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01823-x Thank you op, for this little detour. (but it lurks behind the chess words).