Layered Analysis

We have the ' soul' of astronomy in Chile, Atacama Region. Please visit ALMA Chile Observatory - - - > www.almasite.alma.cl/ Alma is the equivalent of Soul (Spanish/English), that's okay but ALMA is an acronym for Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array.
ALMA Gets a New Hearbeat (published 6 Feb 2024 in ALMA's site). This is a great news.
Greetings from SCL_Chile! ¡Saludos desde Santiago de Chile!

Chile is on my list of places I wish to travel to one day, and if I do get there I will definitely try to visit the Observatory as I do enjoy all things outer space.

@Ferdosco said in #20: > We have the ' soul' of astronomy in Chile, Atacama Region. Please visit ALMA Chile Observatory - - - > www.almasite.alma.cl/ Alma is the equivalent of Soul (Spanish/English), that's okay but ALMA is an acronym for Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. > ALMA Gets a New Hearbeat (published 6 Feb 2024 in ALMA's site). This is a great news. > Greetings from SCL_Chile! ¡Saludos desde Santiago de Chile! Chile is on my list of places I wish to travel to one day, and if I do get there I will definitely try to visit the Observatory as I do enjoy all things outer space.

Ferdosco

#22

We have a Foundation of Social Chess in Spanish edition, www.ajedrezsocial.cl/, sponsored by Club Magic Chess located in Extremadura, Spain. ALMA is an international organization devoted to the observation of the Universe. Website is www.alma.cl/

dboing

edited

#23

@RyanVelez said in #17:

A layer is anything you wish to investigate. Anything you investigate can be broken down into layers, too, if you want. I avoided saying "Sublayers" because such classifications never end (ie: subsublayers, subsubsublayers, etc...)

But "Positional Chess Layer" can be a single layer to someone who understands positional chess well. To someone who understands it less well, they could have "Pawn Weaknesses," "Key Files / Diagonals / Ranks," Maneuvering," and "King Safety" all be individual layers. The Layered Analysis remains flexible in that the investigator, that is the "improver," has full ability to add or remove as many layers as they like.

Two people analyzing the same game using this system will not likely have perfect overlap in their analysis (but this is already true when you have 2 people analyze the same position through traditional means). However, both should hit on a lot of the same themes. The higher the rating, the more overlap there will be when an analysis is done by separate people. This is because higher level people will more easily hone in on the critical details. A professional quality analysis should not deviate to unnecessary details. For example, a game that explores the 4 Knights Game should not deviate to "And technically, white could have played Qh5 to attempt the 4-Move Checkmate."

Anyway, the flexibility offered with this system encourages people of differing levels to analyze their games. People with more knowledge will analyze better, which is still true without this system; however, weaker players and stronger players can still both follow these steps and produce an analysis that is beneficial for growth at their respective levels.

I see, apply the layering to both the board "physics" and the internal model that is evolving in the leaner.

Both have separable chunks (along the game time axis, or the internal model where I guess in the past we would be satisfied just calling those patterns, as if we knew what they would be).

Such chunks in the sequential direction of the single game object, need not be all the layers you were talking about, and could overlap.

From having also separate the chess object into board objects and learner representation of those, it makes it clear that the subjective alea of walks of chess, now having worded handles that we can talk about, so objectifying the subjective of the chess physics, can be different from the chess physics. Learning is evolving that internal model of chess in all of us.

Adapting it through experience and communication with each other. It seems that I was restricting the word layer to things that can be separated issues of the board, that happen at the same chess time or more precisely in parrel.

In all the cases whether board or how we think about it (me making such meta layers), there is the separation creation of the things they point to (board or thinker/learner) and the recombination.

I was restricting to explicit logic recombination of things of the board, as layerable. But the psychological layers can allow recombination without us knowing all the internal psycho-logic of that combination process.

So the superposition principle used, needed not be as local finite rules of chess based. But I think it might help to keep track of what is black box superposition for now, and what can be attributed to the local rules of chess.

My ambition stops at N move rules, and does not include time pressure, for e.g.. I guess those are also layers, of the chess logical type, just superfluous critters for my platonic chess ambition. I am making that clause, to allow me still talking (reading with curiosity) about others ambitions too, but declaring the order in which I would uncover or further narrow the surface of the black-boxes.

those are words, or sharable concepts (object of the board or objects of learning theory). So I am back to Venn Diagrams in my own thinking. words are sets. a word is a set of objects, but a black-box. We can dissect it into its own layers, if we want to.

@RyanVelez said in #17: > A layer is anything you wish to investigate. Anything you investigate can be broken down into layers, too, if you want. I avoided saying "Sublayers" because such classifications never end (ie: subsublayers, subsubsublayers, etc...) > > But "Positional Chess Layer" can be a single layer to someone who understands positional chess well. To someone who understands it less well, they could have "Pawn Weaknesses," "Key Files / Diagonals / Ranks," Maneuvering," and "King Safety" all be individual layers. The Layered Analysis remains flexible in that the investigator, that is the "improver," has full ability to add or remove as many layers as they like. > > Two people analyzing the same game using this system will not likely have perfect overlap in their analysis (but this is already true when you have 2 people analyze the same position through traditional means). However, both should hit on a lot of the same themes. The higher the rating, the more overlap there will be when an analysis is done by separate people. This is because higher level people will more easily hone in on the critical details. A professional quality analysis should not deviate to unnecessary details. For example, a game that explores the 4 Knights Game should not deviate to "And technically, white could have played Qh5 to attempt the 4-Move Checkmate." > > Anyway, the flexibility offered with this system encourages people of differing levels to analyze their games. People with more knowledge will analyze better, which is still true without this system; however, weaker players and stronger players can still both follow these steps and produce an analysis that is beneficial for growth at their respective levels. I see, apply the layering to both the board "physics" and the internal model that is evolving in the leaner. Both have separable chunks (along the game time axis, or the internal model where I guess in the past we would be satisfied just calling those patterns, as if we knew what they would be). Such chunks in the sequential direction of the single game object, need not be all the layers you were talking about, and could overlap. From having also separate the chess object into board objects and learner representation of those, it makes it clear that the subjective alea of walks of chess, now having worded handles that we can talk about, so objectifying the subjective of the chess physics, can be different from the chess physics. Learning is evolving that internal model of chess in all of us. Adapting it through experience and communication with each other. It seems that I was restricting the word layer to things that can be separated issues of the board, that happen at the same chess time or more precisely in parrel. In all the cases whether board or how we think about it (me making such meta layers), there is the separation creation of the things they point to (board or thinker/learner) and the recombination. I was restricting to explicit logic recombination of things of the board, as layerable. But the psychological layers can allow recombination without us knowing all the internal psycho-logic of that combination process. So the superposition principle used, needed not be as local finite rules of chess based. But I think it might help to keep track of what is black box superposition for now, and what can be attributed to the local rules of chess. My ambition stops at N move rules, and does not include time pressure, for e.g.. I guess those are also layers, of the chess logical type, just superfluous critters for my platonic chess ambition. I am making that clause, to allow me still talking (reading with curiosity) about others ambitions too, but declaring the order in which I would uncover or further narrow the surface of the black-boxes. those are words, or sharable concepts (object of the board or objects of learning theory). So I am back to Venn Diagrams in my own thinking. words are sets. a word is a set of objects, but a black-box. We can dissect it into its own layers, if we want to.

Mr_Ginger edited

#24

Thank you master for this article. I learnt a lot of new things from this post. Thanks a lot. I am a student right now and I do not earn so I can't support you financially but I hope, may God and Nature bless you. Lots of love and virtual hugs.

I hope you achieve new heights in your life. Again thank a lot :)

NM RyanVelez

#25

@Mr_Ginger said in #24:

Thank you master for this article. I learnt a lot of new things from this post. Thanks a lot. I am a student right now and I do not earn so I can't support you financially but I hope, may God and Nature bless you. Lots of love and virtual hugs.

I hope you achieve new heights in your life. Again thank a lot :)

It is ok if you cannot support me, no worries. Few do. I could choose to put my articles behind a paywall, or write half an article and charge for the other half. But I don't do that. I make them free. Currently, I have only 1 supporter, and am grateful for even that.

I am taking the lichess-inspired route for support: people can support me if they want, but otherwise it is free.

@Mr_Ginger said in #24: > Thank you master for this article. I learnt a lot of new things from this post. Thanks a lot. I am a student right now and I do not earn so I can't support you financially but I hope, may God and Nature bless you. Lots of love and virtual hugs. > > I hope you achieve new heights in your life. Again thank a lot :) It is ok if you cannot support me, no worries. Few do. I could choose to put my articles behind a paywall, or write half an article and charge for the other half. But I don't do that. I make them free. Currently, I have only 1 supporter, and am grateful for even that. I am taking the lichess-inspired route for support: people can support me if they want, but otherwise it is free.

OctoPinky

#26

@Ferdosco said in #22:

We have a Foundation of Social Chess in Spanish edition, www.ajedrezsocial.cl/, sponsored by Club Magic Chess located in Extremadura, Spain.

Hi, that's my region! Did you know Carlsen and Karjakin played for Magic?

@Ferdosco said in #22: > We have a Foundation of Social Chess in Spanish edition, www.ajedrezsocial.cl/, sponsored by Club Magic Chess located in Extremadura, Spain. Hi, that's my region! Did you know Carlsen and Karjakin played for Magic?

dboing

#27

@RyanVelez said in #25:

I am taking the lichess-inspired route for support: people can support me if they want, but otherwise it is free.

And using lichess as original content platform, first exposure. kudos.

@RyanVelez said in #25: > I am taking the lichess-inspired route for support: people can support me if they want, but otherwise it is free. And using lichess as original content platform, first exposure. kudos.

NM RyanVelez

#28

I am a Lichess supporter, and am grateful for their platform and outlook. I wish more companies operated this way. My company operates similarly to Lichess, and I do personally as well.

Not expecting to get rich, I just figure if people appreciate my offerings they will support me. If not, then they won't, and I enjoy writing about chess anyway.

I am a Lichess supporter, and am grateful for their platform and outlook. I wish more companies operated this way. My company operates similarly to Lichess, and I do personally as well. Not expecting to get rich, I just figure if people appreciate my offerings they will support me. If not, then they won't, and I enjoy writing about chess anyway.

Ferdosco

#29

A OctoPinky,
Extremadura es una comunidad autónoma de España. Yo soy chileno nativo y sé positivamente que los colonizadores que vinieron a Chile marchando desde el virreinato del Perú, eran extremeños. El fundador de la ciudad capital, Santiago, y de muchas otras villas sureñas, fue el capitán general Pedro de Valdivia, oriundo de Extremadura. El nombre de la capital fundada fue Santiago del Nuevo Extremo, en homenaje al apóstol Santiago (su patrono) y en recuerdo de su provincia natal, Extremadura.
Torneos internacionales se juegan en las ciudades de León, Sevilla, Madrid, y otras. En la capital de Extremadura no tengo conocimiento que se jueguen torneos a nivel magisterial internacional.
Cordiales saludos desde Santiago de Chile (SCL).

A OctoPinky, Extremadura es una comunidad autónoma de España. Yo soy chileno nativo y sé positivamente que los colonizadores que vinieron a Chile marchando desde el virreinato del Perú, eran extremeños. El fundador de la ciudad capital, Santiago, y de muchas otras villas sureñas, fue el capitán general Pedro de Valdivia, oriundo de Extremadura. El nombre de la capital fundada fue Santiago del Nuevo Extremo, en homenaje al apóstol Santiago (su patrono) y en recuerdo de su provincia natal, Extremadura. Torneos internacionales se juegan en las ciudades de León, Sevilla, Madrid, y otras. En la capital de Extremadura no tengo conocimiento que se jueguen torneos a nivel magisterial internacional. Cordiales saludos desde Santiago de Chile (SCL).