Breaking The Silence Online

@Sofia-Mary said in #62:
> Naaa, I do not trust, ... your word playing about "raising things" makes you suspicious to be one of that persons, we girls write about here.
About the fact that I can “molest” girls. No, I don’t like to write first. But I have several friends who did it.

@root7001 said in #63:
> Because this, in particular, the description shows that this person is socially inclined, that is, (s)he wants to make friends and communicate.

No it doesn't.

@root7001 said in #63:
> No, these situations are directly related to this one and show that in some situations it is easier not to rebuild the world, but to adapt to the usual one.

If you really think that being unable to escape gravity is equatable to being unable to stop messaging abuse to women chess players then there is little benefit in engaging with you further here.

@BaronVonChickenpants said in #66:
> If you really think that being unable to escape gravity is equatable to being unable to stop messaging abuse to women chess players then there is little benefit in engaging with you further here.
I wasn't really talking about the _impossibility_ of escaping gravity; I was talking about the _opportunity_ of not getting into situations where the deadly force of gravity cannot be avoided.

Likewise, on the Internet, we have the opportunity to reduce the risk of receiving a message that we do not like.

You equate someone simply /existing/ on a chess site to putting themselves into a dangerous situation. Patent nonsense.

@BaronVonChickenpants said in #66:
> No it doesn't.
And I, and I think a fairly large percentage of people, do. Because the entire description was written to be read.
Well, in any case, I recommend writing in the description that sexist messages are not welcome, and their authors will be blocked.
>
>
>

@BaronVonChickenpants said in #68:
> You equate someone simply /existing/ on a chess site to putting themselves into a dangerous situation. Patent nonsense.
I almost completely agree with you.
But I think it’s nonsense to define these messages as danger.

@QueenRosieMary said in #1:
> Comments on lichess.org/@/queenrosiemary/blog/breaking-the-silence-online/h9S8jea9
I recommend that you write in your profile that sexist messages are not welcome.

By the way, I would like to clarify what exactly you consider “sexist” behavior?

Well, I found 1 post in a telegram that describes this situation:
> What kind of sexual harassment can there be on an online site? And even on one where 99% of the users are male.
>
> Of course, I understand that *they* often have situations where two men participate in “marriage games”. But let's go back to
> our realities and see how things stand with us.
>
> So, the situation: A certain woman plays Lichess, and suddenly someone else “harasses” her. How? Did you write something in
> PM?
> If you don't like it, just ignore it or block it.
> And if you like it, well, I’m happy for you. The man makes advances, the woman likes it. Perhaps a new happy couple will appear > somewhere.
>
> Well, if the harassment, this time real, occurs, say, at a live chess tournament, not in person (as in the case described in a recent > blog), then let people with legal specialization deal with it in court.
> But they are not moderators of lichess with feminism of the brain and other bioproblems of the 21st century.

(from t.me/BismarckHack)

@root7001 said in #70:
> But I think it’s nonsense to define these messages as danger.

Maybe you would if you'd received a few....

@root7001 said in #65:
> About the fact that I can “molest” girls. No, I don’t like to write first. But I have several friends who did it.

Yes, yes, your friends. :))

And you speak for them here.
Beeing their voice.
Hmmm.