lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.1
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.1d5+0.22c4+0.3c6+0.23Nf3+0.3Nf6+0.34Nc3+0.2dxc4+0.45a4+0.2Bf5+0.36e3+0.3Bd3+0.67Bxd3+0.6cxd3+0.68Qxd3+0.6e6+0.69O-O+0.6Nbd7+0.710e4+0.7Be7+0.811Bf4+0.7O-O+0.712Rfd1+0.5Qa5+0.513Nd2+0.6Nh5+0.914Be3+0.9Bg5?!+1.7Inaccuracy. Nhf6 was best.14...Nhf615Nc4+1.8Qd8+1.816Nd6?!+0.9...Inaccuracy. e5 was best.16.e5Bxe317.Qxe3[...]16...Bxe3?!+1.6Inaccuracy. Be7 was best.16...Be717Qxe3+1.7Qc7+1.918e5+1.8f6+2.119g3+2.1Nb6+2.520a5+2.3Nd5+2.421Nxd5+2.3exd5+2.322Rdc1?!+1.4...Inaccuracy. a6 was best.22.a6bxa623.Rxa6[...]22...a6+1.523f4+1.4Rad8+1.524Qb3+1.7Rd7+1.725Qb6?!+0.9...Inaccuracy. Ra4 was best.25.Ra4g525...Qxb6+1.026axb6+0.8fxe5+1.027dxe5+0.8g6+0.828b4+0.3Ng7+0.629b5+0.4axb50.030Ra70.0Rb80.031Rxc6+0.1bxc6+0.332Rxd7+0.4Nf5??+4.8Blunder. b4 was best.32...b433b7+4.7Nxd6+5.434exd6+5.3b4?!+9.2Inaccuracy. Kf8 was best.34...Kf835.Rc7Rxb7[...]35Rc7+9.0b3?#12Checkmate is now unavoidable. h6 was best.35...h636.Rc8+36Rc8+#13Kf7#1337Rxb8#10b2#938Rf8+#8Kxf8#839b8=Q+#7
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/cFqvMimS"] [Date "2024.05.25"] [White "Leverkuhn"] [Black "arthi15"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "cFqvMimS"] [UTCDate "2024.05.25"] [UTCTime "19:00:29"] [WhiteElo "2328"] [BlackElo "2238"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+11"] [BlackRatingDiff "-11"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D18"] [Opening "Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 dxc4 5. a4 Bf5 6. e3 { D18 Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System } Bd3 7. Bxd3 cxd3 8. Qxd3 e6 9. O-O Nbd7 10. e4 Be7 11. Bf4 O-O 12. Rfd1 Qa5 13. Nd2 Nh5 14. Be3 Bg5?! { (0.91 → 1.73) Inaccuracy. Nhf6 was best. } (14... Nhf6) 15. Nc4 Qd8 16. Nd6?! { (1.80 → 0.94) Inaccuracy. e5 was best. } (16. e5 Bxe3 17. Qxe3 g6 18. a5 Ng7 19. Qd2 Nf5 20. Ne4 Qh4 21. Ned6 Qe7) 16... Bxe3?! { (0.94 → 1.62) Inaccuracy. Be7 was best. } (16... Be7) 17. Qxe3 Qc7 18. e5 f6 19. g3 Nb6 20. a5 Nd5 21. Nxd5 exd5 22. Rdc1?! { (2.26 → 1.44) Inaccuracy. a6 was best. } (22. a6 bxa6 23. Rxa6 Qd7 24. Qe2 fxe5 25. dxe5 Nf6 26. Rc1 Ne4 27. Nxe4 dxe4) 22... a6 23. f4 Rad8 24. Qb3 Rd7 25. Qb6?! { (1.70 → 0.93) Inaccuracy. Ra4 was best. } (25. Ra4 g5) 25... Qxb6 26. axb6 fxe5 27. dxe5 g6 28. b4 Ng7 29. b5 axb5 30. Ra7 Rb8 31. Rxc6 bxc6 32. Rxd7 Nf5?? { (0.41 → 4.79) Blunder. b4 was best. } (32... b4) 33. b7 Nxd6 34. exd6 b4?! { (5.26 → 9.20) Inaccuracy. Kf8 was best. } (34... Kf8 35. Rc7 Rxb7 36. Rxb7 Ke8 37. Kf2 c5 38. Rxb5 Kd7 39. Rxc5 Kxd6 40. Rc1) 35. Rc7 b3? { (9.04 → Mate in 12) Checkmate is now unavoidable. h6 was best. } (35... h6 36. Rc8+) 36. Rc8+ Kf7 37. Rxb8 b2 38. Rf8+ Kxf8 39. b8=Q+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
1010½½½½
Leverkuhnarthi15
31
Leverkuhn +11
3 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
13 Average centipawn loss
96%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
arthi15 −11
3 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
38 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Slav Defense: Czech Variation
  1. AScannerDarkly (9...Nbd7) Let's gooooooo Lever!
  2. AScannerDarkly (9...Nbd7) I'm going to comment on this game even though both players are way above my pay grade
  3. AScannerDarkly (9...Nbd7) e4 here just to grab the full center
  4. Oachkatzerlschwoaf I've played arthi15 3 months ago when their rating was ~2070
  5. Oachkatzerlschwoaf Thats some steep improvement
  6. Oachkatzerlschwoaf But seeing their other ratings, it makes sense
  7. GiveMeKite Yeah they've been a strong player for a while, doesn't surprise me that their classical rating is getting more in line w their others
  8. GiveMeKite Crazy idea: b4
  9. GiveMeKite Nevermind, just Bxb4, I was only looking at Qxb4
  10. AScannerDarkly (12...Qa5) How about e5 here. If Nh5 then Bd2. If Ne8, then Ne4
  11. Oachkatzerlschwoaf Why would they not play Nd5?
  12. GiveMeKite I shy away from e5 because of Nd5. Also, I want the pawn on e4 to support a potential d5 push at some point to challenge black's structure
  13. GiveMeKite But these are not positions I'm used to playing - maybe challenging black's structure is a bad plan.
  14. GiveMeKite I aim for this pawn structure as black in the Scandi, very very very solid
  15. GiveMeKite Nd2 looks good to me
  16. FunnyLikeAClown Ng5 threatens e5? And if h6 what about e5 anyway and a bunch of trades? Trying to assess who that favors
  17. FunnyLikeAClown Ah nvm
  18. GiveMeKite I think we saw the same reason against Ng5: 13. Ng5 h6 14. e5 hxg5 15. exf6 Bxf6 and black is up a pawn
  19. GiveMeKite With the knight on h5, there may be e5/g4 ideas to trap the knight in the distant future
  20. Oachkatzerlschwoaf I like my knights on the rim, but I fail to see the point of Nh5
  21. GiveMeKite Well, if e5 then g6 to give the knight a retreat square. Not a threat right now at all, but just an idea to keep in the back of your mind
  22. GiveMeKite Here's my interpretation
  23. GiveMeKite Black's DSB is strong puece given black's pawn structure. By removing white's bishop from that diagonal, it gives black's bishop more option
  24. GiveMeKite If white wants to stop that bishop from occupying the strong diagonal, they need to push e5. But that would be a big concession, giving up
  25. GiveMeKite d5 entirely
  26. GiveMeKite Bg5 is interesting, I'd want to keep that bishop but trading the bishops is fine I guess
  27. Oachkatzerlschwoaf Blacks setup looks weird to me
  28. Oachkatzerlschwoaf What if e5 now
  29. FunnyLikeAClown Haha or they just want to trade
  30. GiveMeKite Nc4 wins???
  31. FunnyLikeAClown Threaten qxg2?
  32. GiveMeKite Nc4, remove the defender of the bishop
  33. FunnyLikeAClown Yeah that looks like trouble for black
  34. AScannerDarkly (14...Bg5) Nc4 Qe8
  35. Oachkatzerlschwoaf Qd8
  36. AScannerDarkly (14...Bg5) d8
  37. GiveMeKite Ah I feel ya
  38. FunnyLikeAClown Knight still gets to good squares
  39. GiveMeKite Yessir, Nc4 with a possible Nd6 followup, hit the b pawn. Haven't calculated a whole lot but hitting that soft d6 square cant be bad
  40. GiveMeKite Now is when I'd really consider e5
  41. Oachkatzerlschwoaf e5 -> Ne4 also
  42. GiveMeKite Giving up d5 might be worth it to completely claim d6 and get a strong knight there. You could back up the other knight with Ne4
  43. GiveMeKite Yeah we're all on the same page B)
  44. GiveMeKite Remember those e5/g4 ideas I mentioned with the knight on h5? Those ideas are still present! Black must be careful with trading
  45. GiveMeKite Also 16. d5 might have been interesting
  46. GiveMeKite Those knight jumping in, the queen sliding to h3, might be a good attack here. g6 probably forced due to g4
  47. GiveMeKite Oh or this...
  48. GiveMeKite Does g4 still work?
  49. FunnyLikeAClown Doesn’t it?
  50. GiveMeKite After the e5 exchange, the rook defends f4 for the knight to jump
  51. FunnyLikeAClown Oh sure f4 not f6
  52. GiveMeKite And if the knight can go to f4, it can make it over to d5 and be fine
  53. GiveMeKite Might be something with g3 and Qg5 -> e7 though
  54. arthi15 Qh3 Nf4
  55. FunnyLikeAClown Just qf3?
  56. GiveMeKite If qf3, then fxe5 still saves the knight
  57. GiveMeKite Or results in a knight trade
  58. GiveMeKite BUT black's structure would be worse. Qf3 is towards the top of my list so far - just get a better structure and coast
  59. GiveMeKite Maybe not actually
  60. GiveMeKite I really like g3
  61. GiveMeKite I think g3, Qg5, Qe7 is the best plan I've looked at so far
  62. FunnyLikeAClown Qh3 nf4 qg4?
  63. GiveMeKite Oh clown I like that
  64. GiveMeKite That wins an exchange because of smothered mate threats??
  65. GiveMeKite Ok I think that's the best so far
  66. GiveMeKite I like g3 but clown, that was such a good move. 19. Qh3 Nf4 20. Qg4 Nd5 21. Qxe6+ Kh8 22. Nf7+ Rxf7
  67. FunnyLikeAClown Third try’s the charm
  68. GiveMeKite Also the quiet Rac1 could be good at some point, but since black played f6 I feel like white should focus on the kingside pressure
  69. GiveMeKite g4 now looks good at first glance
  70. GiveMeKite I'm convinced g4 wins a piece, maybe I'm missing something
  71. Oachkatzerlschwoaf g4 Nf4 Qxf4 fxe5 does not work; Qxe5
  72. Oachkatzerlschwoaf so lets switch move order
  73. GiveMeKite Oh yeah you're right
  74. Oachkatzerlschwoaf g4 fxe5 dxe5 Nf4?
  75. GiveMeKite g4 fxe5 gxh5 Qxd6 dxe5, what about that?
  76. GiveMeKite I don't like it honestly, sacrificing the king safety for... a trade?
  77. GiveMeKite Rac1 looks nice
  78. GiveMeKite Even b4 could be good. White has a lot of options I'd say. I really dislike f6 but without that Qh3 it looks like it'll take time to exploit
  79. GiveMeKite I think this is resolving great for white, big space advantage with better king safety
  80. arthi15 I was thinking maybe a6 before Rc1 for white
  81. GiveMeKite I'm mourning Qh3, but I can't wait for the engine to tell us that Qh3 is a mistake somehow lmao
  82. GiveMeKite b4 and Qb3 is an idea. b4 has to come at some point
  83. Inter-temporal (23...Rad8) i'm a bit late to the party
  84. OneKindKing Qb3 or Qf3 with a tactic using the c file
  85. OneKindKing pin
  86. Inter-temporal (24...Rd7) howzit goin oach!
  87. GiveMeKite Rc5 and Rac1 looks golden
  88. Inter-temporal (25.Qb6) hmm. one of those high-level ideas?
  89. GiveMeKite I dislike Qb6 and I don't quite understand it. My best guess is something with an a6/c6 sac and promoting the b pawn
  90. Inter-temporal (25.Qb6) or simply looking for a promotion tactic...
  91. Inter-temporal (25.Qb6) i see. i guess we have to watch to find out
  92. GiveMeKite That knight is strong but I feel like the queen would work well with it once things open up. I just don't understand Qb6
  93. GiveMeKite Yeah we'll see, Leverkuhn knows what they are doing
  94. Inter-temporal (25.Qb6) is there some kind of pattern with a Nd6, Rs flanking on the a & c files...
  95. Inter-temporal (27...g6) maybe just the fact that it keeps a R tied to b7 forever...with no enemy Q to worry about
  96. GiveMeKite You raise a really good point. Qb6 is kinda just "cashing in" on that strong knight, fixing a weakness in black's position
  97. GiveMeKite I'm not convinced by b5 but let's see how it plays out
  98. Inter-temporal (29.b5) there might be some tactics ?
  99. GiveMeKite After axb5 I'm trying to find tactics but I see nothing so far
  100. GiveMeKite But tactics are my weakness for sure so I might be missing something
  101. GiveMeKite Ohhhh I see it know
  102. GiveMeKite now
  103. Inter-temporal (30.Ra7) i was working on something with an analysis window that seemed to net a couple of pawns
  104. GiveMeKite Rxc6, dang that's wild, this is the kinda stuff I struggle to see, so neat
  105. Inter-temporal (30...Rb8) there it is
  106. Inter-temporal (30...Rb8) wow
  107. GiveMeKite Rxc6 works now, and with that knight on d6 there is a threat to win a piece if black takes on b6
  108. Inter-temporal (32.Rxd7) so b6-b7 coming
  109. GiveMeKite But can white force the promotion through? Bc black's b pawn can get going too
  110. GiveMeKite Omg b7 and Nc8 imprisoning the rook
  111. GiveMeKite Dang dude. That kind of vision is just next level
  112. Inter-temporal (32.Rxd7) it might be in his collection of patterns? his 100,000 patterns...
  113. Inter-temporal one move from a Q ending
  114. Inter-temporal gg
  115. AScannerDarkly crazy good game, way to finish r8!
  116. FunnyLikeAClown Bravo...cool game
  117. OneKindKing gg
  118. Leverkuhn I hadn't worked out fully what happens after 32...Ne6
  119. arthi15 b4 instead of Nf5 didn't have time to calculate
  120. Leverkuhn yeah, it was guesswork
  121. arthi15 Ne6 I had calculated it and was lost
  122. Leverkuhn what was the line?
  123. arthi15 Rb7 Rxb7 Nxd7 b4 Na5
  124. arthi15 I think
  125. Leverkuhn hmmm tricky
  126. arthi15 I was tring to find a winning line
  127. Leverkuhn yeah I thought 28.b4 was just strong, then I realized you have a dangerous pawn too, and who knows what's happening
  128. arthi15 so b4 but Ra7 I wasn't sure
  129. Leverkuhn what else?
  130. arthi15 no I had b4 b7 b3 Rd8
  131. arthi15 Rxd8 Nc8
  132. arthi15 and I lose
  133. Leverkuhn right, that was my calculation
  134. arthi15 and Ne6 Rb7
  135. arthi15 so in paninc with 6 seconds I tried Nf4
  136. arthi15 Nf5
  137. arthi15 but I knew it was losing
  138. Leverkuhn it might well have been lost then (I have comp off)
  139. Leverkuhn thanks for the interesting game, that was a strong defensive effort
  140. Leverkuhn see you around!