lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e40.0d5+0.32exd5+0.3Qxd5+0.43Nc3+0.5Qd8+0.54d4+0.5Nf6+0.55Nf3+0.6Bg4+1.06h3+0.7Bxf3+0.87Qxf3+0.8c6+0.98Be3+0.8e6+0.89Bd3+0.8Nbd7+1.010O-O+0.7Bd6+0.711Rad1+0.7O-O+0.912Bc1+0.7Qc7+0.713Ne4+0.8Nxe4+0.714Qxe4+0.9Nf6+0.815Qh4+0.9Be7+0.816Rfe1+0.8g6+1.017Bg5?!+0.2...Inaccuracy. c4 was best.17.c4Nh517...Nd5+0.218Bxe7+0.2Qxe7+0.319Qh6+0.5Qf6+0.520Re4+0.2Qg7+0.421Qh4+0.1Qf6+0.422Qg30.0Rad8+0.123h40.0h50.024c30.0Rd7+0.125Rde1+0.2Rfd80.026Bc20.0a50.027a30.0b50.028Bd10.0Kh7+0.229Bf3+0.2b4+0.530Re5+0.4Qf4?!+1.1Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best.30...Rb731.Bxh5Qf4[...]31Qxf4+1.1Nxf4+1.032Rxa5+1.1bxc3+1.133bxc3+1.1c5??+3.3Blunder. Nd5 was best.33...Nd534.Rc534g3?!+2.2...Inaccuracy. dxc5 was best.34.dxc5Kg735.c6[...]34...cxd4?!+3.3Inaccuracy. Nd3 was best.34...Nd335.Re3c4[...]35gxf4+2.8dxc3+3.236Rc1?!+2.4...Inaccuracy. Rc5 was best.36.Rc5Rd437.Re4[...]36...Rc7+2.437Kf1?!+1.6...Inaccuracy. Re5 was best.37.Re5c238.Kg2[...]37...Rd4+1.538Kg2+1.1Rxf4+1.139Kg3+1.1Rd4?!+1.7Inaccuracy. Rfc4 was best.39...Rfc440.Rc2Rd4[...]40Rb5+1.2Ra4+1.141Rb3+1.1c2+1.142Rb7?!+0.1...Inaccuracy. Be2 was best.42.Be2Rca743.Rxc2[...]42...Rxb7+0.143Bxb7+0.1Rxa3++0.144f3+0.1Rc3+0.145Be4+0.1Kg7+0.146Rxc2+0.1Rxc2+0.147Bxc2+0.1f5?!+0.7Inaccuracy. e5 was best.47...e548.Ba4f6[...]48Ba4+0.9e5+0.749Be8+0.8Kf6+0.750f4+0.7exf4++0.551Kf3+0.1g5+0.152hxg5++0.1Kxg5+0.153Kg2+0.1Kg4+0.154Bc6+0.1Kg5+0.155Bf3+0.1Kh4+0.156Kh2+0.1Kg5+0.157Kh3+0.1h4+0.158Bd1+0.1Kf6+0.159Kxh4+0.1Ke5+0.160Bf3+0.1Kd4+0.161Kh3+0.1Ke3+0.162Kg2+0.1Kd2+0.163Kf2+0.1
½-½
Draw claimed • Insufficient material
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/1Fjk4i8o"] [Date "2020.06.29"] [White "Axp156"] [Black "arbisto"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "1Fjk4i8o"] [UTCDate "2020.06.29"] [UTCTime "19:01:35"] [WhiteElo "2139"] [BlackElo "2126"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+0"] [BlackRatingDiff "+1"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B01"] [Opening "Scandinavian Defense: Valencian Variation, Main Line"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qd8 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Bg4 { B01 Scandinavian Defense: Valencian Variation, Main Line } 6. h3 Bxf3 7. Qxf3 c6 8. Be3 e6 9. Bd3 Nbd7 10. O-O Bd6 11. Rad1 O-O 12. Bc1 Qc7 13. Ne4 Nxe4 14. Qxe4 Nf6 15. Qh4 Be7 16. Rfe1 g6 17. Bg5?! { (1.00 → 0.24) Inaccuracy. c4 was best. } (17. c4 Nh5) 17... Nd5 18. Bxe7 Qxe7 19. Qh6 Qf6 20. Re4 Qg7 21. Qh4 Qf6 22. Qg3 Rad8 23. h4 h5 24. c3 Rd7 25. Rde1 Rfd8 26. Bc2 a5 27. a3 b5 28. Bd1 Kh7 29. Bf3 b4 30. Re5 Qf4?! { (0.35 → 1.13) Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best. } (30... Rb7 31. Bxh5 Qf4 32. Bf3 Qxg3 33. fxg3 bxc3 34. bxc3 Kg7 35. c4 Ne7 36. Rxa5 Rxd4 37. Re4) 31. Qxf4 Nxf4 32. Rxa5 bxc3 33. bxc3 c5?? { (1.05 → 3.33) Blunder. Nd5 was best. } (33... Nd5 34. Rc5) 34. g3?! { (3.33 → 2.23) Inaccuracy. dxc5 was best. } (34. dxc5 Kg7 35. c6 Rc7 36. c4 Rd3 37. Re4 e5 38. Rexe5 Ne6 39. Bd5 Kf6 40. Re3 Rxe3) 34... cxd4?! { (2.23 → 3.28) Inaccuracy. Nd3 was best. } (34... Nd3 35. Re3 c4 36. a4 Rc7 37. Be4 Kg7 38. Rb5 Rd6 39. a5 Ra6 40. Bxd3 cxd3 41. Rxd3) 35. gxf4 dxc3 36. Rc1?! { (3.20 → 2.38) Inaccuracy. Rc5 was best. } (36. Rc5 Rd4 37. Re4 Rxe4 38. Bxe4 Rd4 39. f3 f5 40. Bc2 Rxf4 41. Rxc3 Rxh4 42. a4 Rd4) 36... Rc7 37. Kf1?! { (2.41 → 1.59) Inaccuracy. Re5 was best. } (37. Re5 c2 38. Kg2 Rd4 39. Re4 Rxe4 40. Bxe4 Ra7 41. Rxc2 Rxa3 42. Rc7 Kg7 43. Bc2 Kf6) 37... Rd4 38. Kg2 Rxf4 39. Kg3 Rd4?! { (1.08 → 1.74) Inaccuracy. Rfc4 was best. } (39... Rfc4 40. Rc2 Rd4 41. Ra6 Rd2 42. Rxd2 cxd2 43. Rd6 Rc3 44. a4 Ra3 45. Rxd2 Rxa4 46. Bc6) 40. Rb5 Ra4 41. Rb3 c2 42. Rb7?! { (1.08 → 0.11) Inaccuracy. Be2 was best. } (42. Be2 Rca7 43. Rxc2 Rxa3 44. Rxa3 Rxa3+ 45. f3 Ra7 46. Kf4 Kg7 47. Rc1 Kf6 48. Bd3 Ra3) 42... Rxb7 43. Bxb7 Rxa3+ 44. f3 Rc3 45. Be4 Kg7 46. Rxc2 Rxc2 47. Bxc2 f5?! { (0.11 → 0.66) Inaccuracy. e5 was best. } (47... e5 48. Ba4 f6 49. Kf2 g5 50. hxg5 fxg5 51. Be8 g4 52. Bxh5 gxf3 53. Kxf3 Kh7 54. Ke4) 48. Ba4 e5 49. Be8 Kf6 50. f4 exf4+ 51. Kf3 g5 52. hxg5+ Kxg5 53. Kg2 Kg4 54. Bc6 Kg5 55. Bf3 Kh4 56. Kh2 Kg5 57. Kh3 h4 58. Bd1 Kf6 59. Kxh4 Ke5 60. Bf3 Kd4 61. Kh3 Ke3 62. Kg2 Kd2 63. Kf2 { The game is a draw. } 1/2-1/2
5 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
14 Average centipawn loss
94%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
4 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
14 Average centipawn loss
93%Accuracy
  1. pulsar512b Kf6
  2. Tactix47 Kf6-g7-f6-g7...
  3. pulsar512b and how to stop g5
  4. pulsar512b idk if it works
  5. pulsar512b but interesting at least
  6. pulsar512b f4 threat
  7. pulsar512b actually f4 last move stronger
  8. pulsar512b force back king
  9. garfield1980 all b needs to trade 2 pawns can even sac one.. i dunno sounds easy
  10. gavalanche20 (49) This looks drawn now, I'm not sure how White can take out Black's pawns and hang on to their own
  11. garfield1980 but :]
  12. connerator (49) if u play f4 there's no chance of a passer
  13. garfield1980 i mean white also can lose this
  14. gavalanche20 (50) I'm starting to wonder if maybe Black could even consider that
  15. gavalanche20 (50) Playing for a win
  16. pulsar512b exf4
  17. pulsar512b and then run king to h8
  18. pulsar512b and split the point
  19. MrScribbles Ok, dead draw now. 50...exf4+
  20. pulsar512b yea draw
  21. kcacgt (50) Yeah draw at best now
  22. gigantaure black is better here, no?
  23. pulsar512b no way to win, just Kxf4 and move around king
  24. garfield1980 wut
  25. pulsar512b WHAT
  26. MrScribbles wot
  27. connerator (51) what
  28. pulsar512b g5
  29. MrScribbles lol
  30. pulsar512b g5 rn
  31. connerator (51) omg lol
  32. MrScribbles mouseslip? 51.Kf3
  33. pulsar512b still draw but
  34. garfield1980 now g5
  35. garfield1980 he can lose this:D
  36. pulsar512b still probs a draw tho
  37. MrScribbles That has to be a mouseslip, right?
  38. pulsar512b they should hold
  39. connerator (51) this might even be a win??
  40. pulsar512b or a style
  41. Lou-E h'what
  42. connerator (51) three passers?
  43. garfield1980 what was kg3???
  44. pulsar512b chat is currently "wtf"
  45. connerator (51) actually no this is drawn
  46. garfield1980 :D
  47. connerator (51) take and sac the bishop on h5
  48. gavalanche20 (51) kg5 Kg5 Bh5 Kh5 Bf4?
  49. gavalanche20 (51) I can't calculate if White can hold after that
  50. gavalanche20 (51) *Kf4
  51. IamZex bxh5?
  52. connerator (51) hxg5 Kxg5 Bxh5
  53. garfield1980 probably he can but now he has to hold
  54. garfield1980 omg
  55. connerator (52) Bxh5 works I think
  56. Tactix47 Bb5 still drawn.
  57. MrScribbles yes
  58. gavalanche20 (52) But Bh5 is easier, no?
  59. garfield1980 if he does that
  60. MrScribbles 53.Bxh5 Kxh5 easy draw
  61. Tactix47 Bh5 chances losing.
  62. connerator (52) yeah just take
  63. connerator (53) oh man
  64. Lou-E oof
  65. pulsar512b wot
  66. MrScribbles 53.Bxh5 has zero chance of losing if you know the technique
  67. Lou-E That's going to sting
  68. connerator (53) yeah it's just opposition
  69. gavalanche20 (53) What is happening
  70. MrScribbles 54.Bxh5+ still works.
  71. Cannonbait I don't get it, wasn't Bb5 just drawn?
  72. garfield1980 now it s getting really interesting
  73. MrScribbles Both sides need to slooooooooooooooooow down.
  74. gavalanche20 (54) You have to think about the psychological aspect now
  75. MrScribbles Why are they moving so fast!?
  76. connerator (54) yeah I start moving really fast when I'm below 5
  77. connerator (54) (54) (54) I get stressed out :3
  78. IamZex black cause there's not a lot to calcuate white cause he screwed up the easy draw
  79. gavalanche20 (54) Although I guess h4 Bf3+ Kg5 and neither side can advance?
  80. MrScribbles I don't care if there's not much to calculate. That's how you throw away won positions, because the other side is looking to trick you.
  81. garfield1980 is there any chance that black get prisoned inside his own pawns and got mated?
  82. garfield1980 :]
  83. connerator (55) if only the pawns weren't doubled
  84. IamZex if there's no calculation there's no trick
  85. IamZex kh2 draws now
  86. connerator (55) game is over now
  87. gavalanche20 (55) Yeah I don't see how either side can progress here
  88. IamZex or even kf2
  89. MrScribbles lol premoving
  90. gigantaure oh
  91. MrScribbles I know it's forced, but still funny.
  92. gavalanche20 (58) So yeah, that was probably a good decision to sack the piece then, because a rook endgame two pawns down was probably just gg?
  93. garfield1980 i dont think so.. probably w has misplayed somewhere
  94. MrScribbles I can't with these premoves lol
  95. connerator (62) lol
  96. White offers draw
  97. MrScribbles push push push
  98. Draw offer accepted
  99. MrScribbles gg
  100. connerator (63) gg
  101. Tactix47 gg
  102. gigantaure gg
  103. kcacgt (63) gg
  104. Lou-E gg
  105. adande1 gg
  106. pulsar512b gg
  107. garfield1980 gg
  108. garfield1980 looks like iniating queen trade was not ideal for black
  109. garfield1980 but good come back from that ..
  110. arbisto yeah q trade somehow didnt work out well
  111. garfield1980 you gave up ur knight too quick
  112. garfield1980 but i guess it was already bad atm.,.,
  113. arbisto too quick.
  114. arbisto i spend 5 mins
  115. arbisto when i have already stg like 8 mins
  116. garfield1980 not in terms of time
  117. garfield1980 in terms of fighting:]
  118. Axp156 36.Rc5 was so obvious
  119. arbisto yeah
  120. arbisto rc5 was definitely
  121. Axp156 I confused myself as I though you could attack my a pawn
  122. arbisto what i was expecting
  123. arbisto i am shocked when i saw rc1
  124. Axp156 and I wanted to keep this precious pawn
  125. Axp156 but there after Rxc3 it would have protected my a pawn ...
  126. arbisto that made my only chance
  127. arbisto on move 28
  128. arbisto i spend more than 10 mins to decide between kh7 and qg7
  129. Axp156 there is not much difference there
  130. Axp156 the inaccurary is IMO pushing pawns on the queen side
  131. Axp156 it creates weaknesses
  132. arbisto i didnt realize after q trade half of my pawns are hanging
  133. arbisto yes
  134. arbisto that was to acrivate my rooks
  135. Axp156 and if position opens, then bishop should gain activity agaisnt the knight
  136. arbisto othwise why did i doubled them i hadnt seen
  137. Axp156 from move 25, you should just have waited IMO
  138. Axp156 there was no clear plan for me atm
  139. arbisto indeed
  140. arbisto computer plays calm move after re5
  141. arbisto but i was scared with Bxh5 sac
  142. Axp156 BUT if you start pushing, then there are weaknesses and there may be something to spot for me
  143. arbisto after re5 i tried to exch queens somewhat in panic
  144. Axp156 yes, I create some ghost threat to make to freak
  145. Axp156 haha
  146. arbisto it was there indeed
  147. Axp156 this was all bluff
  148. arbisto engine likes Bxh5
  149. Axp156 when ?
  150. arbisto after re5
  151. arbisto on31
  152. arbisto if i dont play qf4
  153. Axp156 yes
  154. Axp156 sure
  155. Axp156 but this was all bluff still
  156. arbisto thats why i tried qf4
  157. arbisto i see now
  158. Axp156 in the end, your pawns quite advanced on the queen side gave you some counterplay
  159. Axp156 but this is IMO still dangerous as this is double edge
  160. arbisto yes but mainly rc1 gave me whatever i got
  161. arbisto othw. it was dead lost
  162. arbisto i felt
  163. Axp156 yes Rc5 is my big blunder in this game
  164. arbisto i didnt like saving the knight
  165. arbisto played a gamble
  166. arbisto somehow i got lucky
  167. Axp156 I lost lucidity
  168. arbisto :)
  169. Axp156 yes, that s was a good practical choice
  170. Axp156 with two pawns down, there was fewer hope to steal
  171. arbisto in scandi, you should be good with sitting and waiting for your opponent to do stg
  172. arbisto i did it for a while
  173. arbisto in the opening Bg5 was a relief for me
  174. arbisto i expected stg like c4
  175. arbisto on 17.Bf4 i was still planning Nd5
  176. Axp156 well, c4 is weakening d4 forever
  177. Axp156 it s very comitting
  178. Axp156 I know there are so strategy for black to pressure d4 like in the french fort knox
  179. Axp156 then I decided another strategic approach : trade dark square bishop and move around your king
  180. arbisto i see
  181. arbisto it worked quite well actually
  182. arbisto i couldnt resist the pressure
  183. Axp156 haha :D
  184. arbisto not objectively but practically
  185. Axp156 yes, it is really though to do nothing in chess
  186. arbisto and locking my rooks with c3 provoked me push qpawns
  187. Axp156 waiting is so hard
  188. arbisto indeed
  189. Axp156 y
  190. Axp156 that s was the long term plan
  191. Axp156 nothing crushing actually
  192. Axp156 but quite reasonable considering human mind wanting to create (false) plans
  193. arbisto the game was quite an exercise for me as i calculated your kside threat every move in the middlegame
  194. arbisto but I enjoyed
  195. Axp156 yes, but there was nothing crushing there unfortunately
  196. arbisto :) that what i was trying to achieve at every move
  197. arbisto thanks for the game. need to go to bed
  198. arbisto best of luck
  199. Axp156 thanks
  200. Axp156 good night