lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2c6+0.22d4+0.4d5+0.33Nc3+0.3dxe4+0.34Nxe4+0.2Nf6+0.55Nxf6++0.3exf6+0.36Nf3+0.1Bd6+0.37Bd3+0.2O-O+0.28O-O+0.1Bg4+0.29h3+0.1Bh5+0.110Re1+0.1Re8+0.211Rxe8++0.2Qxe8+0.112Qe2+0.2Qf8+0.513Bd2+0.5Nd7+0.414Re1+0.5Bc7+0.815Qe7+0.8Rd8+0.616Bf5+0.2Bd6+0.617Qe4+0.6Bg6+0.618Nh4+0.5Nb6+0.519b3+0.5Nd5+0.720c4+1.0Nc7+0.921c5+1.2Re8??+5.0Blunder. Bxc5 was best.21...Bxc522.dxc522cxd6+5.0Rxe4+5.123dxc7+5.1Bxf5+5.324Nxf5+5.3g6+6.725Nh6++6.6Qxh6+8.926c8=Q++8.3
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/wAY7Po0D"] [Date "2024.02.01"] [White "Silkthewanderer"] [Black "IchmagdasSpiel"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "wAY7Po0D"] [UTCDate "2024.02.01"] [UTCTime "11:03:10"] [WhiteElo "2250"] [BlackElo "2240"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+9"] [BlackRatingDiff "-13"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B15"] [Opening "Caro-Kann Defense: Tartakower Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nf6 5. Nxf6+ exf6 { B15 Caro-Kann Defense: Tartakower Variation } 6. Nf3 Bd6 7. Bd3 O-O 8. O-O Bg4 9. h3 Bh5 10. Re1 Re8 11. Rxe8+ Qxe8 12. Qe2 Qf8 13. Bd2 Nd7 14. Re1 Bc7 15. Qe7 Rd8 16. Bf5 Bd6 17. Qe4 Bg6 18. Nh4 Nb6 19. b3 Nd5 20. c4 Nc7 21. c5 Re8?? { (1.15 → 5.03) Blunder. Bxc5 was best. } (21... Bxc5 22. dxc5) 22. cxd6 Rxe4 23. dxc7 Bxf5 24. Nxf5 g6 25. Nh6+ Qxh6 26. c8=Q+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
8 Average centipawn loss
98%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
40 Average centipawn loss
84%Accuracy
  1. sussasun go silk!
  2. sussasun i thought queenside castle may be better
  3. sussasun but maybe c3 qc2 is the paln
  4. Silkthewanderer 6. Nf3 has gone out of fashion, modern theory claims that the knight belongs to g3. I am claiming something else
  5. sussasun oh thats why
  6. Silkthewanderer The practical challenge for Black is that the usual automoves h5-h4 and Nd7-f8 are not effective here. Play becomes more concrete.
  7. sussasun but the knight has no squareexcept h4
  8. sussasun also dsb on d6 cant bechallenged easily
  9. sussasun queen exchange is fine for black as they need only one rook inthe end game
  10. Silkthewanderer 10. ...Nd7 is theory. This line allows me to get closer to the endgame where the structure is very bad for Black.
  11. Silkthewanderer Or Black avoids the trade and gifts me the e file. Also nice.
  12. mkubecek (12.Qe2) How about Qe6? White could still trade the queens but black would improve the pawn structure.
  13. sussasun white isnt forced to take on e6.moving the c1 bishp guards back rank
  14. mkubecek (12...Qf8) Sure... but then white wouldn't get the e-file for free.
  15. sussasun now black plays re8 after nd7 i guess
  16. mkubecek (12...Qf8) Likely... but then then the queen on f8 will be even more passive than now.
  17. sussasun bc7 and qd6 is a plan
  18. wizzywop Go silk!
  19. sussasun nice to be on a dark square
  20. mkubecek (12...Qf8) Nd7 is a must anyway. But that's not a particularly good place either.
  21. sussasun i like b5 here instead
  22. sussasun to get nb6 and nd5
  23. sussasun also g4 qe7?
  24. Silkthewanderer It is entirely possible that this already is winning. I am struggling to see how Black untangles
  25. sussasun on rd8 there is Bb4
  26. sussasun also bf5 isthere
  27. mkubecek (15...Rd8) Bb4 is not that bad on its own, black can still recapture on f8 with the knight. But the Re7 after that will be a problem.
  28. sussasun Bb4 stops bd6
  29. sussasun also qxd7 and qxc7 is a threat
  30. Silkthewanderer There is one trick for Black, namely Ne5
  31. Silkthewanderer The idea being Qxf8 Kxf8 dxe5 Bxf3... but I have an intermediary Bb4+ and keep the piece
  32. Silkthewanderer LOL, actually forgot that here Bd6 works. Well at least keeps Black alive for now
  33. Silkthewanderer Qxd7 Rxd7 Bxd7 was the option I would have loved to make work but after Be7 Bb4 Bxb4 the endgame isn't any better for me
  34. sussasun oh c5? is not possible
  35. sussasun why is bxc5 bad?or is this better?
  36. Silkthewanderer Turns out an even better Queen sac came along
  37. sussasun bxf5?
  38. Silkthewanderer Unless I have again overlooked a simple defense but then I deserve the L
  39. Silkthewanderer Seeing the idea and not playing it because of ghosts would be unforgivable
  40. AACtrl nice
  41. sussasun gg
  42. Silkthewanderer cxd6 was a very pleasing end. I was already raking myself over the coals why I went for Bf5 so hastily
  43. sussasun engine shows Bxc5 loses to qf4 fork later
  44. sussasun nicely calculated silk
  45. IchmagdasSpiel hmmm Silk did you write in this chat during the game?
  46. Silkthewanderer My confidence was not that great after the Bf5 Bd6 miss earlier
  47. Silkthewanderer Turns out I am just unable to calculate with more than 10 minutes
  48. IchmagdasSpiel I joined right now and wonder about all your text here to be honest..
  49. Silkthewanderer Yes. Players can send to spectators chat. All it takes is the /w prefix
  50. Silkthewanderer Players still don't see any messages until after the game
  51. Silkthewanderer It is quite fun and often humbling because some of the ideas I paste during the game turn out to be completely off :D
  52. sussasun 16.Bb4 wasnt winning either
  53. IchmagdasSpiel I think it's not that far away then from having a look in an opening book e.g. ... get me right: You played well and deserved the victory
  54. IchmagdasSpiel nevertheless I think it's strange
  55. IchmagdasSpiel cu
  56. Silkthewanderer Let's take that last point to Slack
  57. mkubecek It's write only - you can send messages but you cannot see what others write.
  58. IchmagdasSpiel thanks for info mkubecek
  59. mkubecek (Reportedly... I play in zen mode so I don't see either chat anyway.)
  60. mkubecek (...until the game is finished.)
  61. IchmagdasSpiel g2g, bye all
  62. mkubecek bye
  63. Silkthewanderer @sussa, 16. Bb4 would have been the positionally cleaner move and I didn't evaluate it because I was narrow inded on one trick
  64. Silkthewanderer That was my one grievance with myself rather than an objective error