- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Wobble Your Way: Advance in Chess Without Knowing it All

#2

You don't have to know everything, just what's necessary – that is, what's useful. And keep it simple!

You don't have to know everything, just what's necessary – that is, what's useful. And keep it simple!
#3

good points for the wobbling imagery.

good points for the wobbling imagery.
#4

brooooooo wth is the ai generated picture

brooooooo wth is the ai generated picture
#5

I don't think the point was to have an exact number of rows between the material.. The wobbling bicycle was.

I prefer a point made (evocated, explicited) than an obscured wall of exact truth I can't see, the reasoning or purpose toward something else (see I even went from a punch line here, to an unreadable more nuanced statement via editing myself in self-criticism for non exactitude with respect to my average thinking). Original statement was:
I prefer a point made, to a truth I can't see. Now compare the 2.

Yet, I think the improvement formula is a bit abrupt. But I guess there are concerns I do not share or understand about what those blogs are doing on the front page of lichess.

Best is to be chirurgical, find the relevant and be generous to let the less relevant pass if not obstructing the view too much. So. Thanks for bringing that point of not expecting chess learning is just robotic application of some external prefabricated complete knowledge that is required before doing anything or thinking anything.

It is an element to consider in finally thinking about theories of learning in chess. Whether coming from a titled author or not, it can be chewed without having oneself a title, as long as not arguing by title (implicitly or not).

I don't think the point was to have an exact number of rows between the material.. The wobbling bicycle was. I prefer a point made (evocated, explicited) than an obscured wall of exact truth I can't see, the reasoning or purpose toward something else (see I even went from a punch line here, to an unreadable more nuanced statement via editing myself in self-criticism for non exactitude with respect to my average thinking). Original statement was: I prefer a point made, to a truth I can't see. Now compare the 2. Yet, I think the improvement formula is a bit abrupt. But I guess there are concerns I do not share or understand about what those blogs are doing on the front page of lichess. Best is to be chirurgical, find the relevant and be generous to let the less relevant pass if not obstructing the view too much. So. Thanks for bringing that point of not expecting chess learning is just robotic application of some external prefabricated complete knowledge that is required before doing anything or thinking anything. It is an element to consider in finally thinking about theories of learning in chess. Whether coming from a titled author or not, it can be chewed without having oneself a title, as long as not arguing by title (implicitly or not).
#6

Go wobble yourself. This was an awful article.

Go wobble yourself. This was an awful article.
#7
<Comment deleted by user>
#8

Thank you for the article. I think everyone knows this feeling of anxiety when going public with their opinion... or while wobbling on anything else. I seldom have time to study and feel I am not ready to play so I seldom play - especially against humans. I will take your lesson to heart and wobble myself ;-)

Thank you for the article. I think everyone knows this feeling of anxiety when going public with their opinion... or while wobbling on anything else. I seldom have time to study and feel I am not ready to play so I seldom play - especially against humans. I will take your lesson to heart and wobble myself ;-)
#9

Every day without a ChessMood blog is a good day.

Every day without a ChessMood blog is a good day.
#10

This blog post is amazing. I am part of a chess club and we all strongly agreed (including my teacher) with the content in the article and we also had lots of fun reading it. Thank you for this amazing blog post.

This blog post is amazing. I am part of a chess club and we all strongly agreed (including my teacher) with the content in the article and we also had lots of fun reading it. Thank you for this amazing blog post.