lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d40.0d5+0.32c4+0.3e6+0.33Nf30.0Nf6+0.24g3+0.2dxc4+0.45Bg2+0.3c5+0.46Qa4+0.0Nc6+0.47O-O+0.3Bd7+0.18Qxc4+0.2cxd4+0.49Nxd4+0.3Rc8+0.310Nc3+0.4Nxd4+0.411Qxd4+0.3Bc5+0.412Qh4+0.4O-O+0.413Bxb7+0.4Rb8+0.514Bg2+0.2Rb4+0.315e4?!−0.4...Inaccuracy. Qg5 was best.15.Qg515...e5+0.116a3−0.3Rc4?!+0.4Inaccuracy. Rb3 was best.16...Rb317.Nd517Qg5?!−0.2...Inaccuracy. Bg5 was best.17.Bg5Be618.Rad1[...]17...Re80.018Qd20.0Bc6??+2.0Blunder. Be6 was best.18...Be619Qe2+2.0Rd4+1.920Be3+1.8Qb6?!+2.6Inaccuracy. h5 was best.20...h521b4+2.8Bf8+2.922Qa2+2.4Qb7+2.323Bxd4+2.4exd4+2.424Ne2+1.8d3?!+2.6Inaccuracy. Rd8 was best.24...Rd825.Rad1Bxe4[...]25Nf4+2.0Bxe4+2.026Bxe4?!+1.4...Inaccuracy. Rfd1 was best.26.Rfd1g526...Nxe4+1.327Qd5+1.2Qxd5+1.328Nxd5+1.3Rd8+1.229Ne3+1.4d2+1.630f3?!+0.8...Inaccuracy. Ra2 was best.30.Ra2Nc331.Rc2[...]30...Nc3+1.031Nd1+0.6Ne2++1.132Kf2?!+0.2...Inaccuracy. Kg2 was best.32.Kg2Nc133.Nb2[...]32...Nc1+0.433Ne30.0a5?+1.3Mistake. g6 was best.33...g634.Rd1Bg7[...]34Rb1?0.0...Mistake. bxa5 was best.34.bxa5g634...axb40.035axb40.0Bxb40.036Rxb40.0Nd3+0.037Ke20.0Nxb40.038Rd10.0Na20.039Rxd20.0Nc3+0.040Ke10.0Rxd20.0Black offers draw
½-½
Draw by mutual agreement
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/uBht4Jfy"] [Date "2023.09.08"] [White "Silkthewanderer"] [Black "bufferunderrun"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "uBht4Jfy"] [UTCDate "2023.09.08"] [UTCTime "18:01:50"] [WhiteElo "2280"] [BlackElo "2161"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-3"] [BlackRatingDiff "+5"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "E04"] [Opening "Catalan Opening: Open Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 { E04 Catalan Opening: Open Defense } c5 6. Qa4+ Nc6 7. O-O Bd7 8. Qxc4 cxd4 9. Nxd4 Rc8 10. Nc3 Nxd4 11. Qxd4 Bc5 12. Qh4 O-O 13. Bxb7 Rb8 14. Bg2 Rb4 15. e4?! { (0.31 → -0.39) Inaccuracy. Qg5 was best. } (15. Qg5) 15... e5 16. a3 Rc4?! { (-0.26 → 0.44) Inaccuracy. Rb3 was best. } (16... Rb3 17. Nd5) 17. Qg5?! { (0.44 → -0.24) Inaccuracy. Bg5 was best. } (17. Bg5 Be6 18. Rad1 Qe7 19. Nd5 Bxd5 20. b3 Rc3 21. exd5 Bd4 22. Rb1 Rd8 23. Be4 h6) 17... Re8 18. Qd2 Bc6?? { (-0.04 → 2.00) Blunder. Be6 was best. } (18... Be6) 19. Qe2 Rd4 20. Be3 Qb6?! { (1.80 → 2.64) Inaccuracy. h5 was best. } (20... h5) 21. b4 Bf8 22. Qa2 Qb7 23. Bxd4 exd4 24. Ne2 d3?! { (1.82 → 2.62) Inaccuracy. Rd8 was best. } (24... Rd8 25. Rad1 Bxe4 26. Bxe4 Nxe4 27. f3 Ng5 28. Kg2 Ne6 29. Qc4 Rc8 30. Qd3 Rd8 31. Qe4) 25. Nf4 Bxe4 26. Bxe4?! { (2.02 → 1.38) Inaccuracy. Rfd1 was best. } (26. Rfd1 g5) 26... Nxe4 27. Qd5 Qxd5 28. Nxd5 Rd8 29. Ne3 d2 30. f3?! { (1.57 → 0.83) Inaccuracy. Ra2 was best. } (30. Ra2 Nc3 31. Rc2 d1=N 32. Nxd1 Nxd1 33. Re1 g6 34. Ree2 a5 35. bxa5 Ra8 36. Re5 Bxa3) 30... Nc3 31. Nd1 Ne2+ 32. Kf2?! { (1.08 → 0.23) Inaccuracy. Kg2 was best. } (32. Kg2 Nc1 33. Nb2 Rc8 34. Rd1 Rc2 35. Na4 g6 36. Rb1 Bg7 37. Nc5 Bc3 38. Kf1 Bd4) 32... Nc1 33. Ne3 a5? { (0.04 → 1.33) Mistake. g6 was best. } (33... g6 34. Rd1 Bg7 35. Rb1 Na2 36. Kf1 Bf6 37. Ng4 Nc3 38. Nxf6+ Kg7 39. Ne4 Nxb1 40. Ke2) 34. Rb1? { (1.33 → 0.00) Mistake. bxa5 was best. } (34. bxa5 g6) 34... axb4 35. axb4 Bxb4 36. Rxb4 Nd3+ 37. Ke2 Nxb4 38. Rd1 Na2 39. Rxd2 Nc3+ 40. Ke1 Rxd2 { Black offers draw } { The game is a draw. } 1/2-1/2
5 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
0 Blunders
24 Average centipawn loss
91%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
3 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
23 Average centipawn loss
90%Accuracy
  1. Haspelknecht go Silk!
  2. fake_switch gooo silk!
  3. Haspelknecht (1) outstanding move!
  4. loungelizard goo silk!
  5. gavalanche20 Yes, discouraging 1...c5
  6. Haspelknecht 1. d4 has to be the best Anti-Sicilian out there
  7. Silkthewanderer It is kinda reassuring that he thinks now. I was lowkey betting on him not having a system against the Catalan...
  8. Silkthewanderer ...with which he is sufficiently comfortable to just Blitz out
  9. GiveMeKite Go bufferunderrun!
  10. gavalanche20 And yet Silk is the one being on time ehe
  11. gavalanche20 *behind
  12. Haspelknecht faking insecurity
  13. Haspelknecht There is this line with b5 played by black. What would white have to play to transpose into it?
  14. Haspelknecht Ahhh
  15. Haspelknecht actually, now we get into it
  16. Haspelknecht Well, I guess black chooses not to play it
  17. bufferunderrun it's been a while... trying to remember how this line goes
  18. bufferunderrun I think I might have played Be7 here once and then blundered with Nd5
  19. bufferunderrun but if I'm not mistaken the best continuation was to sac the b-pawn
  20. alex11star i am curious if 16...Nxe4 works
  21. alex11star probably doesn't
  22. alex11star definitely not but i think on move 15 it was possible
  23. alex11star if buffer is doing this line from memory, perhaps Nxe4 was the point, to avoid the lines with Bg5 Rd1 Nd5
  24. alex11star i'm stupid ignore that it doesn't work
  25. Mennonite What about Qc8 here? Seems to maintain flexibility and keep some pressure on the kingside with Bf2+ threats in the immediate
  26. alex11star black loses a piece, right?
  27. alex11star Rd4 only move and then Be3
  28. Mennonite That was my thinking with Qc8, prevented that move for at least one move
  29. alex11star although not so trivial because by taking on d4 black has that square
  30. alex11star white is still a pawn up though
  31. alex11star maybe b4 here instead
  32. alex11star Qb2 and Ne2?
  33. alex11star oh Qb2 a5 Ne2 axb4 Nxd4 bxa3
  34. alex11star but i believe that's still pretty easy to win
  35. alex11star Qa2 probably better
  36. alex11star ah missed that
  37. alex11star 23. b5
  38. gavalanche20 (26...Nxe4) I guess Black can try to swindle some mating pattern by teleporting the knight to f3
  39. gavalanche20 (32...Nc1) This got a bit messy :eyes:
  40. fake_switch ggs!
  41. bufferunderrun I think there should be h6 somewhere, I need to look up this line.
  42. Haspelknecht (40) gg
  43. bufferunderrun Got lucky at the end. Perhaps Re8 was a mistake.
  44. Silkthewanderer Huh, didn't know that pawn sac to be theory
  45. Silkthewanderer I thought Black is risking way too much there and I can always consolidate if I play precisely enough
  46. bufferunderrun Yeah, it's a bit risky line to play. I looked at it a few years ago, but don't remember much anymore.
  47. bufferunderrun Alright, so it was Bc6. I was trying to decide between Bc6 and Be6 there. Too little time,
  48. Silkthewanderer Bc6 felt wrong when I saw it
  49. Silkthewanderer Because suddenly I don't have to worry about pieces on g4 anymore
  50. bufferunderrun I thought 22.b5 would have been a game over.
  51. Silkthewanderer And your threats against e4 are not that scary
  52. Silkthewanderer b5 Bd7 Nd7 Nxe4 Re1 Be6 and somehow in my calculation this seemed messy
  53. Silkthewanderer But I can just take the knight there and you have nothing
  54. bufferunderrun Yeah, Idk... I wasn't calculating any of this at this point.
  55. Silkthewanderer Well that is the luxury of being objectively lost :D
  56. Silkthewanderer Just make moves that don't lose immediately and force me to calculat something
  57. Silkthewanderer Anyway, thanks for the game, see you around
  58. bufferunderrun Good luck in the rest of the season.