45:00
45:00
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
in local browser
0-1
Checkmate • Black is victorious
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/sZE9jKRs"]
[Date "2024.11.01"]
[White "JohnJPershing"]
[Black "Estructuralista"]
[Result "0-1"]
[GameId "sZE9jKRs"]
[UTCDate "2024.11.01"]
[UTCTime "14:05:02"]
[WhiteElo "1784"]
[BlackElo "1744"]
[WhiteRatingDiff "-20"]
[BlackRatingDiff "+27"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "2700+45"]
[ECO "B20"]
[Opening "Sicilian Defense"]
[Termination "Normal"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]
1. e4 c5 { B20 Sicilian Defense } 2. Be2 Nc6 3. d3 e6 4. f4 d5 5. Nf3 Bd6 6. O-O Nge7 7. e5 Bc7 8. c3 O-O 9. Na3 a6 10. Nc2 b5?! { (0.16 → 0.72) Inaccuracy. f6 was best. } (10... f6 11. d4 cxd4 12. cxd4 Bd7 13. Kh1 Be8 14. b3 Bg6 15. Bd3 Bh5 16. Qe1) 11. Be3?! { (0.72 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. d4 was best. } (11. d4) 11... Bb6?! { (0.00 → 0.82) Inaccuracy. d4 was best. } (11... d4 12. cxd4) 12. Kh1? { (0.82 → -0.78) Mistake. d4 was best. } (12. d4 c4) 12... Bb7?? { (-0.78 → 1.32) Blunder. d4 was best. } (12... d4 13. cxd4) 13. d4 Nf5 14. Bf2 cxd4 15. Ncxd4 Ncxd4?! { (1.33 → 2.05) Inaccuracy. Nfxd4 was best. } (15... Nfxd4 16. cxd4 f6 17. Bd3 Qe8 18. exf6 Rxf6 19. Qd2 Bc7 20. g3 Bd6 21. Qe2) 16. cxd4 f6 17. Bd3 fxe5 18. Nxe5?! { (1.94 → 1.00) Inaccuracy. fxe5 was best. } (18. fxe5 h5 19. Qd2 Rc8 20. h3 Qe7 21. Kh2 Bc6 22. Rad1 Be8 23. g4) 18... g6?! { (1.00 → 1.69) Inaccuracy. Nd6 was best. } (18... Nd6 19. Qg4 Qe8 20. Rac1 Ne4 21. Be3 b4 22. a4 bxa3 23. bxa3 Bd8 24. f5) 19. Nf3 Qf6 20. Bxf5 Qxf5 21. g3?! { (1.00 → 0.28) Inaccuracy. Be1 was best. } (21. Be1) 21... Rac8 22. Rc1 Rxc1 23. Qxc1 Rc8 24. Qe3 Rc2 25. Rc1?? { (0.15 → -1.54) Blunder. Qb3 was best. } (25. Qb3 Bc7) 25... Rxb2 26. Ne5?! { (-1.43 → -2.39) Inaccuracy. Kg1 was best. } (26. Kg1) 26... Rxa2?! { (-2.39 → -1.62) Inaccuracy. Qe4+ was best. } (26... Qe4+ 27. Kg1 Qxe3 28. Bxe3 Ba5 29. g4 Re2 30. Bf2 Rxa2 31. Nd7 Ra3 32. Nc5) 27. Nd7 Ba5?! { (-1.64 → -0.89) Inaccuracy. Qe4+ was best. } (27... Qe4+ 28. Kg1 Qxe3 29. Bxe3 Ba5 30. Nc5 Bc8 31. Nb3 Bd7 32. Nxa5 Rxa5 33. Rc7) 28. Rc5?? { (-0.89 → -4.69) Blunder. Nc5 was best. } (28. Nc5) 28... Qh3?? { (-4.69 → -1.38) Blunder. Qe4+ was best. } (28... Qe4+ 29. Kg1 Ra1+ 30. Rc1 Qxe3 31. Bxe3 Rxc1+ 32. Bxc1 Bc3 33. Kf1 b4 34. Nc5) 29. Kg1?? { (-1.38 → -5.60) Blunder. Rc1 was best. } (29. Rc1 Bd2) 29... Bd2 30. Qe5 Ra1+ 31. Be1 Rxe1+ 32. Qxe1 Bxe1 33. Nf6+ Kf8 34. f5 gxf5 35. g4?? { (-5.39 → Mate in 4) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Rc7 was best. } (35. Rc7 Bf2+ 36. Kxf2 Qxh2+ 37. Kf3 Qh1+ 38. Ke2 Qg2+ 39. Kd1 Qf1+ 40. Kd2 Qf2+) 35... Qe3+ 36. Kh1 Qf3+ 37. Kg1 Qf2+ 38. Kh1 Qf1# { Black wins by checkmate. } 0-1
Spectator room
- flipiflapi
(1...c5) enjoy enjoy - Feet_Barbie
(3.d3) go estructur - Feet_Barbie
(6...Nge7) nd2 qe1 qh4 are the standard moves i know someone that plays this in our team - Feet_Barbie
(7.e5) but f5 is stronger against a kingside fianchetto - Feet_Barbie
(7...Bc7) e5 maybe leaves some holes i reckon c3 now is good - Feet_Barbie
(7...Bc7) to meet d4 with c4 - Feet_Barbie
(7...Bc7) then nd2 ne4 - Feet_Barbie
(7...Bc7) if blacks not careful g4 h4 can come too - Feet_Barbie
(8.c3) damn he goes c3 ok - Feet_Barbie
(8.c3) blacks a bit crammed for space maybe i d delay castling - Feet_Barbie
(8.c3) queenside counterplay should be good or just b6 bb7 and maybe even long castle - Feet_Barbie
(8...O-O) just dont clarify the center - Feet_Barbie
(8...O-O) uh ok now i like white already - Feet_Barbie
(11.Be3) estru is playing fast though so probably checked this before the game - Feet_Barbie
(11...Bb6) now d4 comes with tempo - Feet_Barbie
(11...Bb6) not a fan of be3 - Feet_Barbie
(12.Kh1) thought white should just go qe1 qh4 or smth ng5 h4 etc - Feet_Barbie
(12.Kh1) d4 could open up the center and weaken white s attacking chances - Feet_Barbie
(12.Kh1) but maybe it just loses a pawn ? ahah - Feet_Barbie
(12.Kh1) i m chatting too much - Feet_Barbie
(12.Kh1) giving the mic to flipiflapi - Feet_Barbie
(13.d4) nf5 to be considered - JohnJPershing
15 cxd4 vs 15 Ncxd4 is an interesting call. Nx seems like an even trade - JohnJPershing
but leaves me with no edge - rohitraj_iit
Go john - JohnJPershing
pawn takes gives a backwards pawn, but keeps tension in the center - Feet_Barbie
(17...fxe5) there s h7 tactics that defend d4 indirectly maybe nxe5 is ok - Estructuralista
it's interesting that there are many possibilities here, he could take with either pawn, even with the knight although i think that's wor - Estructuralista
se - Estructuralista
if he takes with d he'ill keep a better pawn structure but there might be some trouble with me pushing the d pawn, perhaps - Estructuralista
maybe first take the bishop then push - Estructuralista
if he takes if the f pawn , maybe there's some action along the f file - Estructuralista
he played the move I thought was weaker, cause this to me looks like it loses a pawn, but what is white's plan? - d0wnh0me
(18.Nxe5) Let's go Estructuralista! - Estructuralista
it's the bishop sac on h7? that would regain the pawn with the discovered attack on the piece on d4 - flipiflapi
(18.Nxe5) estru sees it noice noice - Estructuralista
yeah the sac works well, cause materially we'd be equal but my pawn structure would be bad and he would have a very active queen and kn - Estructuralista
not the moment to take right now - Feet_Barbie
(18...g6) right but then f6 was probably bad cos of this idk unless just kh8 - Feet_Barbie
(18...g6) or this - Feet_Barbie
(18...g6) now e6 is a juicy target - JohnJPershing
move 20, debating Bxf5. Trade the bad bishop for the good knight. - Feet_Barbie
(21.g3) e5 could tactically work maybe even e5 d4 - flipiflapi
(26.Ne5) im a fan of just rb1 - flipiflapi
(26.Ne5) feels like either way you can get a check and d4 or a2 pawn - flipiflapi
(26.Ne5) unless knight moves and Qxe6 crushes your dreams maybe - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) i wonder if forcing the queen trade might actually be good for black - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) coz of the lsb taking up the defencein d5 square - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) and then just pawns - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) go a/b pawns - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) im liking this - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) qe4+ win please - JohnJPershing
move 27 I think i may have miscalculated a line. Not that I was in a great position before anyways - flipiflapi
(26...Rxa2) rxf2 seems possible even - JohnJPershing
I didnt see Qe4+, and that check ruins a lot of my plants - JohnJPershing
plans - Feet_Barbie
Yeah a G5 knight would have stopped and pressured e6 - Estructuralista
im smelling blood. Qh3 (which keeps e6 covered) - Estructuralista
this threatens mate in 1 in f1 (or in g2 if he moves the bishop to g1), he has no checks so he has to defend - Estructuralista
if Rc1, then theres the Bd2 fork - Estructuralista
if Qc1 I can take the bishop on f2 and threaten mate again, now there he could play Rc8+ Bxc8 Qxc8+ ... a crap, that's actually mate - Estructuralista
for him cause of the knight, so is there anything other than Rxf2? - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) u dont have to take c8 either but messy - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) good calculation exercise though - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) i mean if you eschange queens too i dont think you lose this - Estructuralista
maybe if after Rc8+ I do NOT take the rook, then he's out of checks - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) also some nf6 checks to consider maybe and other variations - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) watch the time - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) nice thinking estruc - Estructuralista
then the queen is under attack, so he must move, and after that I could take his rook - Feet_Barbie
(28.Rc5) but ie he out of checks - Feet_Barbie
(28...Qh3) gary a saw a qga from ghostjw today check it out - gary0892
Haha will do - Feet_Barbie
(28...Qh3) very chill game - Estructuralista
lol I missed that resource, lets see now - Estructuralista
what about Bd2, that looks strong - JohnJPershing
move 31, there is some bite in this position. I believe i am losing. I know I am losing, but black has 3 minutes on the clock - JohnJPershing
and I love a fight to the end - Feet_Barbie
(31.Be1) i mean isnt it over - Feet_Barbie
(31.Be1) re2 - Feet_Barbie
(31.Be1) 1 - JohnJPershing
31....Rxe1 seems obvious, I dont know what black sees - Estructuralista
i think there might have been a quick mate if Bxe1 first but it was super scary and I prefered to play the more simple moves as i was - Estructuralista
short on time - Estructuralista
now the h7 pawn is defended so i guess i can save the lsq bishop too - Feet_Barbie
(33.Nf6+) yeah mate for white - Feet_Barbie
(33.Nf6+) qb8 - Feet_Barbie
(34.f5) bf2 simplest - JohnJPershing
move 35, it's over, but I want to play to the end. Just a habit - Feet_Barbie
(35.g4) m4? - Feet_Barbie
(38.Kh1) nice gg - gary0892
Good game - Feet_Barbie
estru 31 bxe1 is m3 for white - Estructuralista
nice game to end an otherwise abyssmal season - Feet_Barbie
so good decision - Estructuralista
oh wow - Feet_Barbie
interesting game nice opening - Feet_Barbie
yeah white has qb8 and either epaulette or cozio s mate - Estructuralista
didn't consider Qb8 at all, good that i trusted my guts - Estructuralista
also I guess then very good of you to play till the end, I could have screwed up - Feet_Barbie
there s some crazy lines 29. rc1 bd2 nf6+ kf8 qe5 here rc2 only move for black - Feet_Barbie
nice calculation you had to go deep in some lines nice comments i saw you were visualizing well resources in long lines - Feet_Barbie
like not taking on rc8+ - Estructuralista
and yet I didn't see Kg1??? But I guess it didn't save white either way - Estructuralista
Oh crazy, stockfish things Qh3 is a blunder and recommends Qe4+, I saw that move too, and thought it worked, but Qh3 looked very strong to m - Feet_Barbie
yeah its not a blunder it s like a less winning move - Feet_Barbie
but qe4 is simplest even just cos u trade and you cant lose that ever - rohitraj_iit
Sf gives high evals where one side has no counterplay. Eval like a human