lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.4
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.4e60.02Nf3+0.2d5+0.33Nc30.0dxe4+0.24Nxe4+0.5Nd7+0.35d4+0.5Ngf6+0.56Bd3+0.4Nxe4+0.47Bxe40.0Nf6+0.38Bg5+0.4Be7+0.69Bxf6+0.5Bxf6+0.610c3+0.4O-O+0.711O-O+0.2c6+0.312Ne5+0.1Qc7+0.413f4+0.2c5?!+1.1Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best.13...Bd714.Qe2Be8[...]14Rc1?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Qd3 was best.14.Qd3g614...cxd4+0.115cxd4−0.1Qb60.016Rxc8??−4.6...Blunder. Rf3 was best.16.Rf3g617.Rb3[...]16...Raxc8−4.717Bxh7+−5.4Kxh7−5.318Qh5+−5.9Kg8−6.019Ng4−7.1Qxd4+−6.420Kh1−6.6Qxb2−6.2
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/qycHRHWf"] [Date "2023.09.21"] [White "ChessHavoc"] [Black "sgis"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "qycHRHWf"] [UTCDate "2023.09.21"] [UTCTime "07:30:44"] [WhiteElo "1840"] [BlackElo "1870"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-20"] [BlackRatingDiff "+15"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C00"] [Opening "French Defense: Two Knights Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. Nc3 { C00 French Defense: Two Knights Variation } dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nd7 5. d4 Ngf6 6. Bd3 Nxe4 7. Bxe4 Nf6 8. Bg5 Be7 9. Bxf6 Bxf6 10. c3 O-O 11. O-O c6 12. Ne5 Qc7 13. f4 c5?! { (0.21 → 1.08) Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best. } (13... Bd7 14. Qe2 Be8 15. Rad1 Rd8 16. b4 b6 17. Qc4 Rc8 18. Rfe1 g6 19. a3 c5 20. bxc5) 14. Rc1?! { (1.08 → 0.03) Inaccuracy. Qd3 was best. } (14. Qd3 g6) 14... cxd4 15. cxd4 Qb6 16. Rxc8?? { (0.00 → -4.60) Blunder. Rf3 was best. } (16. Rf3 g6 17. Rb3 Qd6 18. Qd2 Rb8 19. Qb4 Qxb4 20. Rxb4 Be7 21. Rb3 Bd6 22. g3 Rd8) 16... Raxc8 17. Bxh7+ Kxh7 18. Qh5+ Kg8 19. Ng4 Qxd4+ 20. Kh1 Qxb2 { White resigns. } 0-1
0101
ChessHavocsgis
02
ChessHavoc −20
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
52 Average centipawn loss
76%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
sgis +15
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
19 Average centipawn loss
95%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
French Defense: Two Knights Variation
1
  1. gavalanche20 (16.Rxc8) This is interesting
  2. gavalanche20 (16.Rxc8) Raxc8 is a fork on d7 but if Rfxc8 Black needs to calculate if Bxh7 isn't working here
  3. sgis (16) holy hell what's happening
  4. gavalanche20 (16.Rxc8) I'm not sure it's anything more than perp because after Rfc8 Bh7 Kh7 Qh5 Kg8 Qf7 I don't think White has time to swing a rook in
  5. gavalanche20 (16.Rxc8) Because d4 hangs with check
  6. sgis (16) check should save me...
  7. gavalanche20 Oh but there was never Nd7 because Qd4 lol
  8. AumarMustafa (16) lets go sgis
  9. sgis (16) hey aumar
  10. sgis (17) I didn't even have breakfast yet... this is too much
  11. sgis (18) either I'm missing some sort of mate or I'm basically up a rook ...
  12. sgis (20) I could just take f4 if i wanted to be extra cheeky
  13. sgis (20) no need to be fancy though
  14. AumarMustafa (20) (20) qxf4 would work
  15. sgis gg. got lucky i had the Zwischenschach
  16. ChessHavoc This went terribly wrong for sure
  17. sgis if it were not for that check, your exchange sac was very interesting
  18. sgis I certainly didn't expect it haha
  19. AumarMustafa ggwp
  20. sgis but a nice one to be aware of in the future
  21. ChessHavoc I thought maybe I could do something with Nd7 after it but didn't seem to have the tempo really to matter
  22. sgis If i do anything other than Raxc8, your sac worked
  23. sgis but it's all because of Qxd4+
  24. sgis which in almost all variations kills your fun
  25. ChessHavoc Yeah
  26. ChessHavoc Well, good luck in the last round. Well played
  27. sgis you too
  28. sgis gg and see you for a rematch in a few years!