- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate
FEN
[Event "rated rapid game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/oYylBmry"] [Date "2023.11.23"] [Round "-"] [White "CyanskyO-o"] [Black "perrym60"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "oYylBmry"] [UTCDate "2023.11.23"] [UTCTime "10:46:54"] [WhiteElo "2034"] [BlackElo "2117"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+9"] [BlackRatingDiff "-7"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "600+5"] [ECO "C35"] [Opening "King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense, Bertin Gambit"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 { [%eval 0.36] } 1... e5 { [%eval 0.35] } 2. f4?! { (0.35 → -0.71) Inaccuracy. Nf3 was best. } { [%eval -0.71] } (2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. Re1 Nd6 6. Nxe5 Be7) 2... exf4 { [%eval -0.43] } 3. Nf3 { [%eval -0.62] } 3... Be7 { [%eval -0.26] } 4. Bc4 { [%eval -0.35] } 4... Bh4+ { [%eval 0.0] } 5. g3?! { (0.00 → -0.98) Inaccuracy. Kf1 was best. } { [%eval -0.98] } (5. Kf1 Be7 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. e5 Nh5 8. Ng5 Bxg5 9. Qxh5 O-O) 5... fxg3 { [%eval -0.7] } 6. O-O { [%eval -0.83] } 6... gxh2+ { [%eval -0.79] } 7. Kh1 { [%eval -0.6] } { C35 King's Gambit Accepted: Cunningham Defense, Bertin Gambit } 7... Nh6?? { (-0.60 → 1.06) Blunder. d5 was best. } { [%eval 1.06] } (7... d5 8. exd5 Bh3 9. Nxh4 Qxh4 10. Qe1+ Qe7 11. Qxe7+ Nxe7 12. Re1) 8. d4 { [%eval 0.71] } 8... O-O?! { (0.71 → 1.43) Inaccuracy. d5 was best. } { [%eval 1.43] } (8... d5 9. Bxd5) 9. Bxh6 { [%eval 1.5] } 9... gxh6 { [%eval 1.21] } 10. Kxh2?? { (1.21 → -1.02) Blunder. Ne5 was best. } { [%eval -1.02] } (10. Ne5 d5) 10... d5 { [%eval -0.47] } 11. Rg1+? { (-0.47 → -1.74) Mistake. Qd2 was best. } { [%eval -1.74] } (11. Qd2 Bg5) 11... Kh8 { [%eval -1.5] } 12. Bxd5 { [%eval -1.36] } 12... Qd7? { (-1.36 → 0.00) Mistake. Nc6 was best. } { [%eval 0.0] } (12... Nc6 13. Qd2) 13. Qf1 { [%eval -0.05] } 13... Bf6 { [%eval 0.17] } 14. Nc3 { [%eval -0.09] } 14... c6?! { (-0.09 → 0.50) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } { [%eval 0.5] } (14... Nc6 15. e5 Bg7 16. Qg2 Rg8 17. Kh1 Qe7 18. Qf2 Be6 19. Be4 f5 20. Bd5 Nd8 21. Raf1) 15. e5? { (0.50 → -0.68) Mistake. Bb3 was best. } { [%eval -0.68] } (15. Bb3 Bxd4) 15... Be7?? { (-0.68 → 1.44) Blunder. Qf5 was best. } { [%eval 1.44] } (15... Qf5 16. Be4 Qh5+ 17. Kg3 Bg5 18. Nxg5 Qxg5+ 19. Kf3 Qe7 20. Ke3 f6 21. Qf4 fxe5 22. Qxe5+) 16. Bb3? { (1.44 → -0.17) Mistake. Qg2 was best. } { [%eval -0.17] } (16. Qg2) 16... Qf5 { [%eval -0.12] } 17. Rg3?! { (-0.12 → -0.83) Inaccuracy. Kh1 was best. } { [%eval -0.83] } (17. Kh1 Na6 18. Qg2 Qh3+ 19. Qxh3 Bxh3 20. Ne4 Rad8 21. Rae1 Nc7 22. c3 Be6 23. Ref1 Nd5) 17... f6?? { (-0.83 → 2.92) Blunder. Na6 was best. } { [%eval 2.92] } (17... Na6 18. Ng1) 18. Qe2? { (2.92 → 1.56) Mistake. Nh4 was best. } { [%eval 1.56] } (18. Nh4 Qxf1 19. Rxf1 f5 20. Nxf5 Bxf5 21. Rxf5 Na6 22. Rgf3 Rxf5 23. Rxf5 Rf8 24. Rxf8+ Bxf8) 18... Nd7?? { (1.56 → 6.53) Blunder. Na6 was best. } { [%eval 6.53] } (18... Na6 19. Ne4) 19. Nh4?! { (6.53 → 4.63) Inaccuracy. Rag1 was best. } { [%eval 4.63] } (19. Rag1 Qh5+ 20. Rh3 Qf5 21. Qg2 Qxh3+ 22. Qxh3 Nxe5 23. Qg3 Ng4+ 24. Kh1 h5 25. Rg2 Bb4) 19... Qf4 { [%eval 4.02] } 20. Qh5?? { (4.02 → 1.79) Blunder. Nf5 was best. } { [%eval 1.79] } (20. Nf5 Qxf5 21. Rf1 Nb6 22. Rxf5 Bxf5 23. Qe3 h5 24. Qf4 Bg4 25. Ne4 Rae8 26. exf6 Bxf6) 20... fxe5 { [%eval 1.62] } 21. Ng2 { [%eval 1.46] } 21... Qf6?? { (1.46 → 8.96) Blunder. Nf6 was best. } { [%eval 8.96] } (21... Nf6 22. Nxf4) 22. Ne4 { [%eval 9.61] } { Black resigns. } 1-0