lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.4
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.4d6+0.82c4?!0.0...Inaccuracy. d4 was best.2.d4Nf63.Nc3[...]2...g6?!+0.7Inaccuracy. e5 was best.2...e53.d3c5[...]3d4+0.5Nf6+0.74Nc3+0.7Bg7+0.75Be2+0.1O-O+0.56h40.0h5+0.57Nf3+0.3e5?!+1.0Inaccuracy. a6 was best.7...a68.Be3Ng4[...]8dxe5?!+0.3...Inaccuracy. d5 was best.8.d5a59.Ng5[...]8...dxe5+0.29Qxd8+0.2Rxd8+0.210Bg5+0.2Nc6?!+1.3Inaccuracy. c6 was best.10...c611.Nxe511O-O?+0.1...Mistake. Nd5 was best.11.Nd5Rd612.Bxf6[...]11...Bg4+0.612Nd5+0.5Nxe4+0.613Bxd8+0.6Rxd8+0.514Rfe1+0.7Nd6+0.415Rac1+0.7Bxf3+0.716Bxf3+0.9Nd4+0.717b3?!−0.1...Inaccuracy. Nxc7 was best.17.Nxc7Bh617...c60.018Nc3?!−0.6...Inaccuracy. Ne3 was best.18.Ne318...Nxf3+?+0.7Mistake. N6f5 was best.18...N6f519.Rcd119gxf3+0.7Nf5+0.620Re4?−0.9...Mistake. Rcd1 was best.20.Rcd1Rf820...Bf6?!0.0Inaccuracy. Rd3 was best.20...Rd321f40.0exf40.022Rxf4?!−1.0...Inaccuracy. Rd1 was best.22.Rd1Rc823.Ne2[...]22...Bxh4?!0.0Inaccuracy. Rd3 was best.22...Rd323.Ne423Ne4??−2.1...Blunder. Rd1 was best.23.Rd1Rxd1+24.Nxd1[...]23...Kg7?!−1.0Inaccuracy. Be7 was best.23...Be724.Kf1Rd4[...]24Rc2?−2.4...Mistake. Re1 was best.24.Re1Kf825.Kf1[...]24...Rd4?!−1.5Inaccuracy. Rd1+ was best.24...Rd1+25.Kg2Bd8[...]25Kg2?−2.9...Mistake. c5 was best.25.c5Bf626.Rxf5[...]25...Bg5??−0.4Blunder. Bd8 was best.25...Bd826.Re2Nh4+[...]26Rxf5−0.4gxf5−0.427Nxg5−0.3Rg4+−0.328Kf3??−2.7...Blunder. Kh3 was best.28.Kh3Rxg529.Rd2[...]28...Rxg5−2.729Rd2−2.8h4?!−1.9Inaccuracy. Kf6 was best.29...Kf630.Rd6+Kg7[...]30Kf4?−3.9...Mistake. Rd4 was best.30.Rd4Rg130...Rg1?!−2.5Inaccuracy. Rg4+ was best.30...Rg4+31.Kf3a5[...]31f3−2.6h3−2.032Rh2−2.1Rg2−2.133Rxh3−1.9Rxa2−2.134Kxf5−2.1Rb2??−0.2Blunder. Ra5+ was best.34...Ra5+35.Kg4Ra3[...]35f4−0.1f6+0.236Rg3+0.0Kf70.037Rh30.0Rg2+0.138Rd30.0Ke70.039Re3+0.0Kf70.040Rd30.0Re20.041Rh30.0Re7+0.442Rh7++0.3Ke8+0.243Rh8++0.2Kf7+0.244Rh7++0.4Kf8+0.345Rh8+0.0Kg70.046Rh30.0b50.047Rg3+0.0Kf70.048Rg60.0bxc40.049Rxf6+0.0Ke8−0.550bxc40.0Kd7+0.251c5+0.1a5+0.252Rf80.0Rh7+0.453Kg6+0.2Rh1+0.354Ra80.0Ke60.055Rxa50.0Rg1+0.056Kh60.0Kf60.057Kh70.0Rh1+0.058Kg80.0Rg1+0.059Kf80.0Ke60.060Ra20.0Rf10.061Ra40.0Kd50.062Ke70.0Kxc50.063Ke60.0Kb50.064Re40.0c50.065f50.0c40.066Re20.0c30.067f60.0Kc40.068f70.0Rxf70.069Kxf70.0Kd30.070Rh20.0c20.071Rxc20.0Kxc20.0
½-½
Insufficient material • Draw
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/kvdXAwMg"] [Date "2023.09.09"] [White "Seb32"] [Black "mgold"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "kvdXAwMg"] [UTCDate "2023.09.09"] [UTCTime "15:31:16"] [WhiteElo "2076"] [BlackElo "2103"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+1"] [BlackRatingDiff "-2"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "E73"] [Opening "King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 d6 2. c4?! { (0.75 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. d4 was best. } (2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 e5 4. Nf3 Nbd7 5. Bc4 Be7 6. O-O O-O) 2... g6?! { (0.00 → 0.73) Inaccuracy. e5 was best. } (2... e5 3. d3 c5 4. g3 g6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. a3 a6 7. Nge2) 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. Be2 { E73 King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development } O-O 6. h4 h5 7. Nf3 e5?! { (0.30 → 0.98) Inaccuracy. a6 was best. } (7... a6 8. Be3 Ng4 9. Bg5 Nd7 10. O-O Re8 11. Qd2 Nf8 12. Rad1) 8. dxe5?! { (0.98 → 0.29) Inaccuracy. d5 was best. } (8. d5 a5 9. Ng5 Na6 10. f3 Nc5 11. Be3 c6 12. Qd2 a4) 8... dxe5 9. Qxd8 Rxd8 10. Bg5 Nc6?! { (0.20 → 1.30) Inaccuracy. c6 was best. } (10... c6 11. Nxe5) 11. O-O? { (1.30 → 0.14) Mistake. Nd5 was best. } (11. Nd5 Rd6 12. Bxf6 Bxf6 13. c5 Rxd5 14. exd5 Nb4 15. Rd1 Nxa2 16. O-O Nb4 17. Ng5 Kg7) 11... Bg4 12. Nd5 Nxe4 13. Bxd8 Rxd8 14. Rfe1 Nd6 15. Rac1 Bxf3 16. Bxf3 Nd4 17. b3?! { (0.72 → -0.14) Inaccuracy. Nxc7 was best. } (17. Nxc7 Bh6) 17... c6 18. Nc3?! { (-0.03 → -0.61) Inaccuracy. Ne3 was best. } (18. Ne3) 18... Nxf3+? { (-0.61 → 0.71) Mistake. N6f5 was best. } (18... N6f5 19. Rcd1) 19. gxf3 Nf5 20. Re4? { (0.62 → -0.88) Mistake. Rcd1 was best. } (20. Rcd1 Rf8) 20... Bf6?! { (-0.88 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Rd3 was best. } (20... Rd3) 21. f4 exf4 22. Rxf4?! { (0.00 → -1.03) Inaccuracy. Rd1 was best. } (22. Rd1 Rc8 23. Ne2 f3 24. Ng3 Nxh4 25. Rd7 Ng2 26. Rd3 Nh4) 22... Bxh4?! { (-1.03 → -0.04) Inaccuracy. Rd3 was best. } (22... Rd3 23. Ne4) 23. Ne4?? { (-0.04 → -2.11) Blunder. Rd1 was best. } (23. Rd1 Rxd1+ 24. Nxd1 Be7 25. Nb2 Kf8 26. Nd3 c5 27. Ne5 Kg7 28. Nd3 f6 29. b4 cxb4) 23... Kg7?! { (-2.11 → -1.00) Inaccuracy. Be7 was best. } (23... Be7 24. Kf1 Rd4 25. Rc2 Nd6 26. Nxd6 Rxf4 27. Nxb7 Bb4 28. a3 Bxa3 29. Ra2 Be7 30. Rxa7) 24. Rc2? { (-1.00 → -2.44) Mistake. Re1 was best. } (24. Re1 Kf8 25. Kf1 Be7 26. Rf3 Bb4 27. Ra1 a5 28. a3 Be7 29. c5 Rd4 30. Re1 h4) 24... Rd4?! { (-2.44 → -1.48) Inaccuracy. Rd1+ was best. } (24... Rd1+ 25. Kg2 Bd8 26. Rxf5 gxf5 27. Nc5 b6 28. Na6 c5 29. b4 Be7 30. bxc5 bxc5 31. Rb2) 25. Kg2? { (-1.48 → -2.91) Mistake. c5 was best. } (25. c5 Bf6 26. Rxf5 gxf5 27. Nd6 Rg4+ 28. Kh1 Rb4 29. Nxf5+ Kg6 30. Nd6 Bd4 31. Kg2 f5) 25... Bg5?? { (-2.91 → -0.39) Blunder. Bd8 was best. } (25... Bd8 26. Re2 Nh4+ 27. Kh3 g5 28. Rxh4 gxh4 29. f3 Be7 30. Nf2 Kf8 31. Re5 Rd2 32. Ne4) 26. Rxf5 gxf5 27. Nxg5 Rg4+ 28. Kf3?? { (-0.28 → -2.72) Blunder. Kh3 was best. } (28. Kh3 Rxg5 29. Rd2 f4 30. Rd7 Ra5 31. Rxb7 Rxa2 32. Kg2 Kf6 33. Rc7 Kg5 34. Rxf7 h4) 28... Rxg5 29. Rd2 h4?! { (-2.79 → -1.86) Inaccuracy. Kf6 was best. } (29... Kf6 30. Rd6+ Kg7 31. Rd2 Rg4 32. Ke3 h4 33. f3 Rg5 34. Rh2 Rh5 35. Kf2 Rh6 36. f4) 30. Kf4? { (-1.86 → -3.89) Mistake. Rd4 was best. } (30. Rd4 Rg1) 30... Rg1?! { (-3.89 → -2.54) Inaccuracy. Rg4+ was best. } (30... Rg4+ 31. Kf3 a5 32. Rd1 a4 33. bxa4 Rxc4 34. Rb1 Rxa4 35. Rxb7 Rxa2 36. Kg2 Ra3 37. Rd7) 31. f3 h3 32. Rh2 Rg2 33. Rxh3 Rxa2 34. Kxf5 Rb2?? { (-2.15 → -0.18) Blunder. Ra5+ was best. } (34... Ra5+ 35. Kg4 Ra3 36. f4 a5 37. Rg3 Kf6 38. Rh3 Ke6 39. Rh5 f6 40. Rc5 Rxb3 41. Rxa5) 35. f4 f6 36. Rg3+ Kf7 37. Rh3 Rg2 38. Rd3 Ke7 39. Re3+ Kf7 40. Rd3 Re2 41. Rh3 Re7 42. Rh7+ Ke8 43. Rh8+ Kf7 44. Rh7+ Kf8 45. Rh8+ Kg7 46. Rh3 b5 47. Rg3+ Kf7 48. Rg6 bxc4 49. Rxf6+ Ke8 50. bxc4 Kd7 51. c5 a5 52. Rf8 Rh7 53. Kg6 Rh1 54. Ra8 Ke6 55. Rxa5 Rg1+ 56. Kh6 Kf6 57. Kh7 Rh1+ 58. Kg8 Rg1+ 59. Kf8 Ke6 60. Ra2 Rf1 61. Ra4 Kd5 62. Ke7 Kxc5 63. Ke6 Kb5 64. Re4 c5 65. f5 c4 66. Re2 c3 67. f6 Kc4 68. f7 Rxf7 69. Kxf7 Kd3 70. Rh2 c2 71. Rxc2 Kxc2 { The game is a draw. } 1/2-1/2
0110011010010101½½
Seb32mgold
3½5½
Seb32 +1
5 Inaccuracies
5 Mistakes
2 Blunders
27 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
mgold −2
9 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
2 Blunders
26 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation
  1. mgold 1. e4, no surprise here
  2. Ivory12 go mgold
  3. mgold hi ivory o/
  4. Ivory12 mgold decided dutch was too admirable, had to play the pirc
  5. Gingersquirrelnuts (1...d6) Mod battle!
  6. mgold (1) so the goal here with the pirc is to play an opening where seb can't/shouldn't put their pawn on c3
  7. mgold the assumption being as a Danish/Ponziani/Alapin player, that will hopefully feel a little unnatural
  8. mgold c4 is weird
  9. mgold well I've gotten an e4 player to play a KID, so thats something at least
  10. MrScribbles (3.d4) Go seb and go mgold! But go mgold more since they're on my team
  11. mgold you see, the problem here is that I am also not a KID player
  12. MrScribbles (5...O-O) lol
  13. mgold fortunately I have played Be2 from the white side a few times, so maybe I will manage okay haha
  14. mgold though come to think of it maybe I don't know those lines as well as I would hope
  15. jeremyjh go seb!
  16. mgold (15) what a position
  17. jeremyjh (16...Nd4) about just Nc7 and let him take on f3. the pawn on f3 will restrict the remaining knight
  18. mgold (19) well now it feels like I have real compensation
  19. fake_switch (23...Kg7) goooo chesss!
  20. mgold (29) both the stable a6 and the more concrete h4 seem pretty good
  21. mgold but I suppose I'm a concrete player, no?
  22. alex11star if a mod beats another mod does that mod become supermod?
  23. mgold (31) endgames are hard
  24. alex11star the pawn endgame looks winning for white possibly
  25. alex11star maybe not
  26. alex11star no never mind definitely not
  27. Gingersquirrelnuts (48.Rg6) Re6 I guess here?
  28. Hindemith 48...Re6 49. c5 b4 50. Rg7+ Kxg7 51. Kxe6 is tempting to me
  29. Hindemith c5 to give a lead in pawn race there
  30. Hindemith if trying all out for winning chance
  31. alex11star now i think it's winning
  32. alex11star re6 rg7
  33. alex11star although bxc4 bxc4 a5... maybe not yet
  34. Gingersquirrelnuts (48.Rg6) I was looking at that- is it winning? Seems to lead to drawish stuff to me.
  35. Hindemith 48...bxc4 is very good
  36. Gingersquirrelnuts (48...bxc4) Interesting. It looks good now it's on the board
  37. Hindemith 50...Rf7?
  38. Hindemith trying to calculate. should be considered
  39. Gingersquirrelnuts (50.bxc4) nice idea if that works
  40. alex11star c5 seems pretty forced
  41. Gingersquirrelnuts (51...a5) Run Andy a pawn!
  42. alex11star re8 rx kx ke6 a4 kd6 a3 kxc6 a2 wins for black probably
  43. alex11star but black needs to watch out for re8 rf7 kc8 ra7
  44. alex11star rh7 kg6?
  45. alex11star rh7 kg6 ke7 maye
  46. Hindemith I think white wins this one.
  47. Seb32 54. Ra8 Ra1 f5 Kc7 f6 Kb7 f7 Kxa8 f8+ K... Qg7+ K... Qxa1 :)
  48. mgold (55) whew, I think should be a draw now
  49. mgold whoops meant to play Rh1
  50. mgold oh well probably still fine
  51. Hindemith I was thinking 59...Rd1 instead
  52. Hindemith man I don't understand these "simple" rook endgames at all
  53. Hindemith I thought one side was better, then the other, and back again
  54. Gingersquirrelnuts gggg
  55. alex11star gg
  56. Seb32 i think in the end neither of us played as poorly as we felt we did
  57. fake_switch ggs!
  58. mgold yeah dead drawn mostly the whole once I play Rb2 apparently
  59. mgold and my exchange sac isn't so bad!
  60. Seb32 i think allowing that nice f4 Kf5 structure makes Rb2 worse than Ra5+ Ke4 Ra3 f4
  61. Seb32 because there the king gets out
  62. mgold I did not even see Ra5+ exists lol
  63. mgold those backwards moves!
  64. Seb32 yeah I had some blindspots too
  65. Seb32 i thought I had Bg4 completely covered and missed Rg4+ at the end
  66. mgold probably I should have just allowed a repetition sooner - I figured that endgame was probably drawn
  67. Seb32 if I knew that Kg2 didnt work I would have played Re1
  68. mgold but I wanted to just play it out a bit more
  69. Seb32 oh yeah I dont think you played longer than necessary anywhere
  70. Seb32 even up to the end i was worried i might lose it
  71. Seb32 because if you naively push the pawns you lose
  72. Seb32 66. f6 c3 f7 c2 0-1
  73. mgold yeah, and sometimes when I recalculated certain lines I realized they were just straight up losing
  74. Seb32 exactly
  75. Seb32 and it changes like every 2 moves depending where the kings are
  76. mgold oh interesting... I had thought 50... Rf7 was losing
  77. mgold it was my initial plan but it was one of those when I reculculated I thought I was dead
  78. Seb32 i definitely missed it but i didnt think i was losing it
  79. Seb32 i really expected 48.. Re6
  80. Seb32 and there both Rg7+ and Rh6 are interesting
  81. mgold yeah I considered it but it looked nasty
  82. mgold I wasn't super sure what to do after Rh6
  83. mgold vs bxc4 is actually kind of tricky
  84. mgold if you take c6 after Rxf6+ I think you lose
  85. Seb32 yeah i agree
  86. mgold and once your king gets too far on the kingside I thought it was a straightforward enough draw
  87. mgold since we both end up just having to sac our rooks for the last passed pawn
  88. mgold anyway I need to have lunch now - thanks again for the game seb and good luck with the rest of the season!
  89. Seb32 thanks!, you too!