lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
-0.1
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1b4−0.1Nf6−0.12Bb2−0.1g6−0.13c4−0.1Bg7−0.24e3−0.1O-O−0.15Nf3−0.2d60.06Be2−0.1e5−0.17d4−0.3e4?!+0.5Inaccuracy. exd4 was best.7...exd48.Nxd4a5[...]8Nfd2+0.4Qe7+0.79O-O+0.7c6+0.810b5+0.3c5+0.811Qb3+0.5Bf5+0.612f3?−0.9...Mistake. h3 was best.12.h3h513.Rd1[...]12...Re8?!+0.1Inaccuracy. exf3 was best.12...exf313f4+0.1Nbd7+0.314d5+0.3Nf8+0.615h3+0.6h5+0.616Nc3+0.5N8h7+0.717a4+0.6Qd7+0.918Rf2+0.6g5?+1.9Mistake. a5 was best.18...a519.Bd1b6[...]19fxg5+1.7Nxg5+2.020Raf1?!+1.2...Inaccuracy. Nd1 was best.20.Nd1Ngh721.Bc3[...]20...Bxh3+0.821Qd1??−1.6...Blunder. Nd1 was best.21.Nd1Ng422.Bxg7[...]21...Ng4−1.322Bxg4−1.4Bxg4−1.223Qb1−1.7f5−1.524a5−2.0h4−1.925Ne2−2.1Be5−1.726Nf4−2.2Qg7−2.327Nb3−2.9Kf7−2.228Bxe5−2.1Rxe5−2.129Nd2−1.9Nh3+??+0.7Blunder. Rh8 was best.29...Rh830.Kh2Ke7[...]30Nxh3??−1.7...Blunder. gxh3 was best.30.gxh3Bxh3+31.Kh1[...]30...Bxh3−1.531Nxe4−1.6Rg8?!−0.5Inaccuracy. Ke7 was best.31...Ke732.b6a6[...]32Kh2−0.6Bxg2??+2.5Blunder. Ke7 was best.32...Ke733.b6a6[...]33Rxf5+??−1.0...Blunder. Ng5+ was best.33.Ng5+Qxg534.Rxf5+[...]33...Rxf5??+12.6Blunder. Ke8 was best.33...Ke834.Rxe5+34Rxf5+?+4.9...Mistake. Nxd6+ was best.34.Nxd6+34...Ke7+4.835Rg5+4.5Qxg5?+8.8Mistake. Qh7 was best.35...Qh736.Rxg236Nxg5+8.6Rxg5+8.637Qh7++8.4Kf6+8.338Qxh4+8.0
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/kUX4jn4C"] [Date "2018.07.12"] [White "PatzerNacional"] [Black "WhiteD4ath"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "kUX4jn4C"] [UTCDate "2018.07.12"] [UTCTime "16:00:07"] [WhiteElo "2006"] [BlackElo "2000"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+13"] [BlackRatingDiff "-24"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "A00"] [Opening "Polish Opening: King's Indian Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. b4 Nf6 2. Bb2 g6 { A00 Polish Opening: King's Indian Variation } 3. c4 Bg7 4. e3 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. d4 e4?! { (-0.32 → 0.51) Inaccuracy. exd4 was best. } (7... exd4 8. Nxd4 a5 9. a3 axb4 10. axb4 Rxa1 11. Bxa1 c5 12. bxc5) 8. Nfd2 Qe7 9. O-O c6 10. b5 c5 11. Qb3 Bf5 12. f3? { (0.62 → -0.87) Mistake. h3 was best. } (12. h3 h5 13. Rd1 Nbd7 14. Nf1 h4 15. Nc3 Rae8 16. a4 a5 17. Rac1 b6 18. Rb1 Bh6) 12... Re8?! { (-0.87 → 0.07) Inaccuracy. exf3 was best. } (12... exf3) 13. f4 Nbd7 14. d5 Nf8 15. h3 h5 16. Nc3 N8h7 17. a4 Qd7 18. Rf2 g5? { (0.62 → 1.87) Mistake. a5 was best. } (18... a5 19. Bd1 b6 20. Rc1 Re7 21. Ne2 h4 22. Nc3 Rd8 23. Be2 Qc7 24. Nd1 Nd7 25. Bc3) 19. fxg5 Nxg5 20. Raf1?! { (2.00 → 1.23) Inaccuracy. Nd1 was best. } (20. Nd1 Ngh7 21. Bc3 Bh6 22. Qb2 Bg5 23. Nf1 h4 24. a5 a6 25. b6 Reb8 26. Nd2 Rf8) 20... Bxh3 21. Qd1?? { (0.77 → -1.58) Blunder. Nd1 was best. } (21. Nd1 Ng4 22. Bxg7 Kxg7 23. Rf4 Re5 24. gxh3 Nxh3+ 25. Kg2 Nxf4+ 26. exf4 Re7 27. Ne3 Nxe3+) 21... Ng4 22. Bxg4 Bxg4 23. Qb1 f5 24. a5 h4 25. Ne2 Be5 26. Nf4 Qg7 27. Nb3 Kf7 28. Bxe5 Rxe5 29. Nd2 Nh3+?? { (-1.92 → 0.72) Blunder. Rh8 was best. } (29... Rh8 30. Kh2 Ke7 31. Qa1 Kd8 32. Qc3 h3 33. g3 Kc8 34. Ra1 Qh6 35. Rff1 Kb8 36. Qb2) 30. Nxh3?? { (0.72 → -1.74) Blunder. gxh3 was best. } (30. gxh3 Bxh3+ 31. Kh1 Bxf1 32. Qxf1 Rg8 33. Rg2 Qh8 34. Ne6 Rg3 35. Qf2 Qh6 36. Nf1 Ke7) 30... Bxh3 31. Nxe4 Rg8?! { (-1.61 → -0.51) Inaccuracy. Ke7 was best. } (31... Ke7 32. b6 a6 33. Qb2 Rg8 34. Kh1 Bg4 35. Nd2 Rxe3 36. Qxg7+ Rxg7 37. Kh2 Ra3 38. Nf3) 32. Kh2 Bxg2?? { (-0.65 → 2.53) Blunder. Ke7 was best. } (32... Ke7 33. b6 a6 34. gxh3 Rxe4 35. Kh1 Qg5 36. Qc2 Rxe3 37. Re2 f4 38. Rxe3+ fxe3 39. Qh7+) 33. Rxf5+?? { (2.53 → -0.99) Blunder. Ng5+ was best. } (33. Ng5+ Qxg5 34. Rxf5+ Ke8 35. Rxg5 Rgxg5 36. Rf2 Be4 37. Qf1 Rgf5 38. Rf4 Rxf4 39. exf4 Re7) 33... Rxf5?? { (-0.99 → 12.63) Blunder. Ke8 was best. } (33... Ke8 34. Rxe5+) 34. Rxf5+? { (12.63 → 4.91) Mistake. Nxd6+ was best. } (34. Nxd6+) 34... Ke7 35. Rg5 Qxg5? { (4.52 → 8.77) Mistake. Qh7 was best. } (35... Qh7 36. Rxg2) 36. Nxg5 Rxg5 37. Qh7+ Kf6 38. Qxh4 { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
PatzerNacionalWhiteD4ath
10
PatzerNacional +13
1 Inaccuracy
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
56 Average centipawn loss
80%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
WhiteD4ath −24
3 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
81 Average centipawn loss
69%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Polish Opening: King's Indian Variation
  1. PatzerNacional I expected this type of setup from black
  2. PatzerNacional I have two options here. To play d3 and stop the pawn advancement to e4, or to play d4 and encourage that advancement
  3. PatzerNacional A reverse french where his good bishop is fianchettoed. I think I have the headstart in this setup
  4. PatzerNacional I am unsure why Qe7 was played rather than a minor piece development. I can simply O-O and d5 will be met simply with cxd5
  5. PatzerNacional b5 seems quite reasonable, continuing my queen-side expansion
  6. PatzerNacional I probably should've left my pawn on b4, now I'm quite unsure of what my plan is
  7. Lukhas what the heck is that opening
  8. Scarff Orang utan I believe. I played it for a bit because of the name, but I have no clue what to do in it
  9. Donkey-Kong16 Its a cool opening and tricky to play against.
  10. Donkey-Kong16 any thoughts on a good move here?
  11. Donkey-Kong16 its a very tight position
  12. PatzerNacional I feel about as safe as a skydiver without a parachute
  13. Sonata2 saccing on h3 is an interesting idea here
  14. Donkey-Kong16 looks good!
  15. Alex_1987 that's all he can do I suppose, otherwise it is just lost
  16. Alex_1987 but bxh3 rxf6 anyway
  17. Alex_1987 although bxg2 might be an option - complicated
  18. Donkey-Kong16 very complicated..
  19. Donkey-Kong16 its all going to explode in a mo
  20. PatzerNacional my position is busted after some f5
  21. PatzerNacional I'm somehow back in the game
  22. Donkey-Kong16 great come back - come on....
  23. PatzerNacional this is way too complicated Kh2 or Qc2
  24. PatzerNacional there's probably a gm draw here somewhere. Don't worry, I'll find it
  25. Lukhas :)
  26. PatzerNacional k+p endgame after Qxh4. Time to calculate that one out
  27. PatzerNacional Conclusion: Nope