lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e40.0d6+0.32d4+0.4Nf6+0.43Nc3+0.4g6+0.34Be3+0.2c6+0.35Qd2+0.3b5+0.36Bd3+0.4Nbd7+0.37Nf3+0.3Bg7+0.38Bh6+0.5O-O+0.49Bxg7+0.4Kxg7+0.510e5+0.3dxe5+0.411dxe5+0.4Ng4+0.512Qg5+0.5Ndxe5+0.313Nxe5+0.4f6+0.514Nxc6+0.7Qb6?!+1.5Inaccuracy. Qxd3 was best.14...Qxd315.cxd3fxg5[...]15Qxb5??−1.3...Blunder. Qh4 was best.15.Qh4Qxc616.Be4[...]15...Qxf2+−1.216Kd1−1.4Bd7−1.217Qb7−1.2Qxg2−1.318Re1−1.5Nf2+?!−0.8Inaccuracy. Qxc6 was best.18...Qxc619.Qxc619Kc1−0.7Nxd3+−0.420cxd3−0.4Qxc6−0.321Qxc6−0.4Bxc6−0.222Rxe7+−0.4Rf7−0.223Re6?!−0.9...Inaccuracy. Rxf7+ was best.23.Rxf7+23...Bd7−0.824Re3−0.9f5−0.925Kd2−0.9f4−0.826Rf3?!−1.6...Inaccuracy. Re5 was best.26.Re5Bc627.Ne4[...]26...Bc6−1.327Rf2−1.6Re8?!−1.0Inaccuracy. Rd8 was best.27...Rd828.Rg1h6[...]28Raf1−1.2g5−1.229h4−1.0h6−1.130hxg5−1.6hxg5−1.731Ne2−1.6Rd8?!−0.9Inaccuracy. Bd5 was best.31...Bd532.Rg1Kh6[...]32Nxf4−1.0gxf4−1.133Rxf4−1.2Rxd3+?!−0.1Inaccuracy. Rxf4 was best.33...Rxf434Kxd3−0.1Bb5+−0.135Kc3−0.1Bxf1−0.136Rxf7+−0.1Kxf7−0.137Kb4−0.1Ke6−0.138Ka5−0.1Kd5−0.139a4−0.1Bd3−0.140b4−0.1Kc6−0.141b5+−0.1Kb7−0.142Kb4−0.1Kb6−0.143a5+−0.1Kb7−0.144Kc5−0.1Be2−0.145Kb4−0.1Kc8−0.146Kc5−0.1Kd7−0.147Kb4−0.1Kd6−0.148Ka4−0.1Bf3−0.149Kb4−0.1Bd5−0.150Ka3−0.1Kc5−0.151Kb2−0.1Kxb5−0.152Ka1−0.1Kxa5−0.153Kb2−0.1Kb4−0.154Ka1−0.1Ka3−0.155Kb1−0.1a5−0.156Ka1−0.1Kb4−0.157Kb2−0.1Be4−0.158Ka2−0.1a4−0.159Kb2−0.1Bd3−0.160Ka2−0.1Kc3−0.161Ka3−0.1Bb5−0.162Ka2−0.1Kc2−0.163Ka1−0.1Kb3−0.164Kb1−0.1Kc3−0.165Ka1−0.1Bc4−0.166Kb1−0.1Bb3−0.167Ka1−0.1a3−0.168Kb1−0.1Kb4−0.169Ka1−0.1Ka4−0.170Kb1−0.1Bc2+0.0
½-½
Draw claimed • Insufficient material
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/g6OTyZ0W"] [Date "2018.06.09"] [White "InfernalJumble"] [Black "fisher56"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "g6OTyZ0W"] [UTCDate "2018.06.09"] [UTCTime "18:00:27"] [WhiteElo "1928"] [BlackElo "1945"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+0"] [BlackRatingDiff "-1"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B07"] [Opening "Pirc Defense: 150 Attack"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. Be3 c6 5. Qd2 { B07 Pirc Defense: 150 Attack } b5 6. Bd3 Nbd7 7. Nf3 Bg7 8. Bh6 O-O 9. Bxg7 Kxg7 10. e5 dxe5 11. dxe5 Ng4 12. Qg5 Ndxe5 13. Nxe5 f6 14. Nxc6 Qb6?! { (0.74 → 1.54) Inaccuracy. Qxd3 was best. } (14... Qxd3 15. cxd3 fxg5 16. O-O Bd7 17. Nxe7 Rae8 18. Ned5 Nf6 19. Nxf6 Rxf6 20. Rae1 Rfe6 21. Rxe6) 15. Qxb5?? { (1.54 → -1.31) Blunder. Qh4 was best. } (15. Qh4 Qxc6 16. Be4 Qe6 17. O-O-O Rb8 18. Rhe1 Qf7 19. Bd5 e6 20. Bb3 Nh6 21. g4 b4) 15... Qxf2+ 16. Kd1 Bd7 17. Qb7 Qxg2 18. Re1 Nf2+?! { (-1.53 → -0.85) Inaccuracy. Qxc6 was best. } (18... Qxc6 19. Qxc6) 19. Kc1 Nxd3+ 20. cxd3 Qxc6 21. Qxc6 Bxc6 22. Rxe7+ Rf7 23. Re6?! { (-0.23 → -0.88) Inaccuracy. Rxf7+ was best. } (23. Rxf7+) 23... Bd7 24. Re3 f5 25. Kd2 f4 26. Rf3?! { (-0.81 → -1.64) Inaccuracy. Re5 was best. } (26. Re5 Bc6 27. Ne4 Rb8 28. b3 Bxe4 29. Rxe4 Rd8 30. Rf1 g5 31. d4 Kg6 32. Kd3 Rd6) 26... Bc6 27. Rf2 Re8?! { (-1.62 → -0.96) Inaccuracy. Rd8 was best. } (27... Rd8 28. Rg1 h6 29. h4 f3 30. Re1 Rfd7 31. Re3 g5 32. hxg5 hxg5 33. Rexf3 Bxf3 34. Rxf3) 28. Raf1 g5 29. h4 h6 30. hxg5 hxg5 31. Ne2 Rd8?! { (-1.57 → -0.88) Inaccuracy. Bd5 was best. } (31... Bd5 32. Rg1 Kh6 33. b4 f3 34. Rh2+ Kg6 35. Ng3 Re5 36. Rgh1 g4 37. Rh6+ Kg5 38. R1h5+) 32. Nxf4 gxf4 33. Rxf4 Rxd3+?! { (-1.18 → -0.08) Inaccuracy. Rxf4 was best. } (33... Rxf4) 34. Kxd3 Bb5+ 35. Kc3 Bxf1 36. Rxf7+ Kxf7 37. Kb4 Ke6 38. Ka5 Kd5 39. a4 Bd3 40. b4 Kc6 41. b5+ Kb7 42. Kb4 Kb6 43. a5+ Kb7 44. Kc5 Be2 45. Kb4 Kc8 46. Kc5 Kd7 47. Kb4 Kd6 48. Ka4 Bf3 49. Kb4 Bd5 50. Ka3 Kc5 51. Kb2 Kxb5 52. Ka1 Kxa5 53. Kb2 Kb4 54. Ka1 Ka3 55. Kb1 a5 56. Ka1 Kb4 57. Kb2 Be4 58. Ka2 a4 59. Kb2 Bd3 60. Ka2 Kc3 61. Ka3 Bb5 62. Ka2 Kc2 63. Ka1 Kb3 64. Kb1 Kc3 65. Ka1 Bc4 66. Kb1 Bb3 67. Ka1 a3 68. Kb1 Kb4 69. Ka1 Ka4 70. Kb1 Bc2+ { The game is a draw. } 1/2-1/2
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
10 Average centipawn loss
94%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
5 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
9 Average centipawn loss
96%Accuracy
  1. InfernalJumble took a lot of checking but I think I can get away with this
  2. InfernalJumble 15. Qd2 would have been a nice safe pawn, oh well
  3. InfernalJumble this seemed necessary given my pieces were so tied down
  4. InfernalJumble plus this doesn't looks bad exactly
  5. InfernalJumble that's nice, missed this
  6. White offers draw
  7. Black declines draw
  8. InfernalJumble this is drawn even without the white pawns, so unless I'm walking into a mate...
  9. Black offers draw
  10. Draw offer accepted
  11. InfernalJumble Well played
  12. InfernalJumble In hindsight Qxb5 was too risky
  13. fisher56 Maybe
  14. fisher56 But I didn't expected Qb7
  15. InfernalJumble I think Qd2 or Qh4 was safer
  16. fisher56 a move which computer likes
  17. InfernalJumble My king was never quite safe
  18. InfernalJumble After the rooks came off it was drawn, computer seems to think Black has chances with rooks on
  19. InfernalJumble I've never seen Qb6 before, but if I had the position again I wouldn't take on b5
  20. fisher56 Yeah. Ithin you're right 15.Qh4 Qxc6 16.be4 Qe6 17.0-0-0 Rb8 seems clearly better for white !;)
  21. fisher56 *i think
  22. InfernalJumble Spent half an hour on that move, then regretted making it for the rest of the game
  23. InfernalJumble I agree the line you give is nice for White
  24. fisher56 There is a game with Qd2 is the base :lichess.org/TMXOahZ7/black
  25. InfernalJumble 23-move draw :o
  26. fisher56 Yeah it seems strange :D
  27. InfernalJumble Wow about a 3-point swing on 15.Qxb5?