Search "user:rxd3ath"

yea that all sounds nice, but getting destroyed by 1400 players when you could beat 1700 just a day ago, certainly seems like something has occured in the system. i read they have done adjustments to …

has anyone else noticed that something has happened with ratings? i was playing consistently in the 1600 range for blitz then all the sudden 2-3 days ago i can't win shit, and my rating is down under …

i would appreciate staff weighing in on this, i think this gets ignored too often and something should at least be said, if not done

after a decent thread it really seems like the simplest and least intensive way to greatly reduce the number of cheaters is to up the requirement for entry, possibly using a time based criteria instea…

i think that the people in this conversation have agreed this would best: 1. increase the reqirements for tourney entry, possibly time based. if its a month, a cheater only gets a dozen at most chance…

ps- i feel like post scanning could be difficult becaue you have to adjust a bunch of scores, remove them, etc. do you remove the games completely from the standing or does anyone who played a cheater…

yay a good discussion. i think as far as scanning games, if you scanned the top 2/3 players in a tourney that would be sufficient. each game can be scanned and i'm pretty sure it wouldn't take more th…

laser: you are definitely right about sandbaggers, which is a much harder thing to detect and police. that discussion is much harder to have, and is more of a behavior detection problem then a outrigh…

well i've shown 4/5 of the tourneys were won by a cheater, your minimizing is irrelevant, and if i go back farther there is more. you are wrong. its a problem. when 4/5 of the last tourneys have been …

i completely disagree, i've reported something like a dozen cheaters, all from tourneys in the last week or two, todays example has already closed the account. i would say more winners of these tourne…