| General Chess Discussion - Cheating#3 You are probably right! :-) | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Cheating#1 It appears that cheating is rampant from the notifications I get about refunded points and the amount of people I see with the "this person uses computer assistance" badge of honor. I'm glad they are … | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#21 ProfDrHack- "Why do people think that the rules of one single country should have greater weight in internet chess (by definition international) than the official world-wide rules?" -That argument is … | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#15 Sargon - I take it back. I didn't think the mate was possible. Thanks for showing. | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#14 Thanks for your two cents. And Just because its FIDE doesn't make it right. And increment doesn't solve a draw. | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#10 Toadsky - not sure what your point is with this? There is ample material to mate on both sides. Sargon - Yes, slim to no chances of black winning, but that's not my point. A pawn could be converted to… | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#6 Obviously we are playing FIDE rules and not USCF. Well I guess some people would be dumb enough to promote their pawns to two knights and allow their king to be trapped by a single bishop. So that 1 o… | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#3 I had two pawns to his bishop. Yes, if i had more time I could've won, but he had no chance. Doesn't seem fair he should be awarded the victory. | HelloChessFriend |
| General Chess Discussion - Why is this not a draw?#1 I ran out of time, but my opponent only had a king and bishop. He did not have enough material to mate, yet he was awarded the victory. I've played on other sites, and they consider it a draw even if … | HelloChessFriend |