| Game analysis - Can you find the mate in 9?#4 i didnt feel like calculating either haha | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - Can you find the mate in 9?#2 https://lichess.org/HlHTJlSG/black#45 | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - Can you find the mate in 9?#1 On move 23, no cheating :) Merry Christmas | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - This is how 2300's actually play#3 we sometimes do yes. | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - Queen sac in the Kings gambit 2400 rated#1 Shame i lost on time, nevertheless an amazing game. https://lichess.org/fAVwz7fX3NxN | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - KID Saemisch: best idea/move?#13 Ne5 is probably the move you want to calculate here, problem is I feel like I can calculate this for while and still dont understand the position. Man i really should play some other openings. | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - 20 Blunders in a 2200 game - do you have advice for me?#6 I just played this game, the engine is not very happy with me either. https://lichess.org/C7zIBaEdXiyO | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - 20 Blunders in a 2200 game - do you have advice for me?#3 sometimes, decent players play terribly. This is just a case of an insanely difficult position. I dont think a GM would play with without atleast a high centipawn loss. | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - (reasonably high rated) Rook sac in the opening done right.#1 https://lichess.org/GU6fDbjbV0VY | Proleet ![]() |
| Game analysis - What you guys think of this Kings Gambit game?#2 You can see the engine going crazy and not liking anything, but as a human its all pretty hard to find. | Proleet ![]() |
| Next |
|---|
