Search "user:HelloItsDmitri"

Comments on https://lichess.org/@/helloitsdmitri/blog/is-a-rook-on-an-open-file-a-good-piece/pcZUejm6

@Wodjul said in #12: > There is perhaps no bad way but maybe are there less efficient ways and more efficient ways? I have a quick question. > > If I was studying 1-move forks, do you think it would b…

@KMcGeoch said in #6: > The experiment could never be the same, as I do not actually have a way to get feedback from you. As mentioned in the post, I would instead " simulate" your replies - of course…

@kinglovesqueens said in #4: > Very interesting - I can relate to it. I noticed a typo in the blog ( minor one) - "anwser" ( instead of answer) Thank you! I make that mistake again and again (I actual…

Comments on https://lichess.org/@/helloitsdmitri/blog/confirmation-bias-what-is-it-and-how-does-it-apply-to-chess/VaIkw2ER

@Wodjul said in #8: > Rapid recognition of simple tactical patterns is essential. I don't have this rapid recognition and I have to calculate everything, even one move and two move tactics. It is hard…

@mullerrj said in #6: > Re: time spent on Openings. I believe the reason more time is spent on Openings than Tactics is because if you make a mistake in the Opening, and lose a piece, many times there…

Hey, I think you posted the article without finishing the conclusion? Very interesting article by the way

@rankweis-learning said in #4: > This is the line I was thinking of but I knew there were a bunch of moves I wasn't calculating. I wrote 3. Qc3 when I meant 3. Qd4, my mistake > > I don't think it's t…

@rankweis-learning said in #2: > The image posted doesn't have a solution! I found a way to win the exchange but the position seems like it might hold more. > > But is it 1...Bc5 2. Qc3 (2. Qxc5 Nxd3)…