lichess.org
Donate

Who would win a war, between teams NATO+India versus Taliban+China+Pakistan+Arab countries?

Whatever side has Australian Emu Brigade assets embedded will shit it in.

Oh... and I just love the trend that's emerging here of trawling twitter in order to average it out so you can find out what opinions you should have about stuff, and that.
Why tf do you think something like this is even possible?
@Dallasisanortard2
> Every muslim country in the world either voted in favor of the Xinjiang facilities or abstained.
They need to trade and take loans from China or Because Uighurs are minority . Same with Rohingiya and Ahmediya .
They will cry against Israel for genocide in Palestine which is just retaliation and for Kashmiris which is non-existent .
@AnimeWillDieSoon said in #37:
> @Dallasisanortard2
>
> They need to trade and take loans from China or Because Uighurs are minority . Same with Rohingiya and Ahmediya .
> They will cry against Israel for genocide in Palestine which is just retaliation and for Kashmiris which is non-existent .

China didn't cut off trade against a single nation which voted in favor of the resolution. And your second sentence isn't worthy of a response.
@Dallasisanortard2 said in #38:
> China didn't cut off trade against a single nation which voted in favor of the resolution.
China imposed trade sanctions on Norway in 2010 for honouring the imprisoned dissident Liu Xiaobo with the Nobel peace prize,

In July 2019, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and other Muslim-majority states that pose as defenders of the faith helped to block a western motion at the United Nations calling for China to allow “independent international observers” into the Xinjiang region. Iran issues occasional criticisms but wants Chinese support in its struggle against the Trump administration and so keeps its complaints coded. Their hypocrisy is almost funny, if you take your humour black. Iran, Egypt, Syria and dozens of other countries that could not tolerate a magical realist novel can live with the mass sterilisation of Muslim women. They will give concentration camps a conniving wink of approval, but draw the line at cartoons in a Danish newspaper.

Source : www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/04/why-do-muslim-states-stay-silent-over-chinas-uighur-brutality
@AnimeWillDieSoon said in #37:
> @Dallasisanortard2
>
> They need to trade and take loans from China or Because Uighurs are minority . Same with Rohingiya and Ahmediya .
> They will cry against Israel for genocide in Palestine which is just retaliation and for Kashmiris which is non-existent .

China didn't cut off trade against a single nation which voted in favor of the resolution. And your second sentence isn't worthy of a response.@AnimeWillDieSoon said in #39:
> China imposed trade sanctions on Norway in 2010 for honouring the imprisoned dissident Liu Xiaobo with the Nobel peace prize,
>
> In July 2019, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and other Muslim-majority states that pose as defenders of the faith helped to block a western motion at the United Nations calling for China to allow “independent international observers” into the Xinjiang region. Iran issues occasional criticisms but wants Chinese support in its struggle against the Trump administration and so keeps its complaints coded. Their hypocrisy is almost funny, if you take your humour black. Iran, Egypt, Syria and dozens of other countries that could not tolerate a magical realist novel can live with the mass sterilisation of Muslim women. They will give concentration camps a conniving wink of approval, but draw the line at cartoons in a Danish newspaper.
>
> Source : www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/04/why-do-muslim-states-stay-silent-over-chinas-uighur-brutality

A sanction in 2010 for a completely unrelated matter when they didn't have the same people leading their government (for the most part) is not relevant. 2010 was 12 years ago.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.