Is it Queens Gambit for White that is superior, like Sicilian Defense for Black. What's your opinion?
Define your criteria of extremely successful?
Statistically, white has 55% vs 45% for black.
Any opening > 55% is better for white and > 45% is better for black.
A good opening book/ explorer should be able to tell you statistics of individual lines.
Statistically, white has 55% vs 45% for black.
Any opening > 55% is better for white and > 45% is better for black.
A good opening book/ explorer should be able to tell you statistics of individual lines.
There exists no superior opening. Chess is a draw.
ive just beaten an im
#4 kimdanger2 he got timedout
QGD is good, but not superior. Sicilian defense is pretty much equal.
@MananAgrawal @kimdanger2 just beat an FM by resignation. She(?) was losing on the board, but the FM wasn't playing well.
According to computer analyses, Blackmar-Diemer Gambit is the best opening. According to humans trying to make a buck, it's everything under the Sun. My preference is the Scotch Gambit as it gives me positions that I like. I've tried playing the "safer" queen pawn openings, but they don't have the volatility that makes chess somewhat of a distraction.
According to computer analyses, Blackmar-Diemer Gambit is the best opening. According to humans trying to make a buck, it's everything under the Sun. My preference is the Scotch Gambit as it gives me positions that I like. I've tried playing the "safer" queen pawn openings, but they don't have the volatility that makes chess somewhat of a distraction.
ive studied those two and i prefer sicilian
Scholar‘s mate is equally successful as Fool‘s mate.
PS: in that given link Sicilian is compared to QGD - minority attack! lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/about-sicilian-defense#2
PS: in that given link Sicilian is compared to QGD - minority attack! lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/about-sicilian-defense#2
HELLO SIR CAN U JOIN MY TEAM
I AM YOUR FAN
I AM YOUR FAN
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.