Very well played. I love the tartakower myself. I have a suggestion. Instead of going for the plan of Qc7, another nasty plan is to go for h4 h3 and if they play h3, make a battery with ur queen and bishop and sac on h3 in many positions.
Also I don't think I would have played Ba6 there. Also after the rook sac, instead something like Ng6 feels more useful.
But no chess games are perfect, and as far as imperfect chess games go this on was impressive. Nice one. Give urself a pat on the back. :)
@ferrousman101 said in #4:
> But no chess games are perfect, and as far as imperfect chess games go this on was impressive. Nice one. Give urself a pat on the back. :)
Thank you for taking the time to look, and I'm extremely grateful for your suggestions! h4 is indeed a very interesting idea that I could use, especially in blitz or bullet—and of course rapid!
The idea behind ba6 was to put pressure on the e2 square. Bb7 was perhaps a better idea to target g2 and opponent castling while encouraging to push c5. Your suggestion of Ng6 is an excellent idea, but I wouldn't have been familiar with this pawn sacrifice, which would have cost me an attacking asset, although it would balance my position and castling.
Best regards !
> But no chess games are perfect, and as far as imperfect chess games go this on was impressive. Nice one. Give urself a pat on the back. :)
Thank you for taking the time to look, and I'm extremely grateful for your suggestions! h4 is indeed a very interesting idea that I could use, especially in blitz or bullet—and of course rapid!
The idea behind ba6 was to put pressure on the e2 square. Bb7 was perhaps a better idea to target g2 and opponent castling while encouraging to push c5. Your suggestion of Ng6 is an excellent idea, but I wouldn't have been familiar with this pawn sacrifice, which would have cost me an attacking asset, although it would balance my position and castling.
Best regards !
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.