No Taxation Without Representation

Billions and trillions, eh? Wow! Those are some BIG pockets!

EDIT: the post to which I responded has been "deleted by user," in case anybody misunderstands to whom I was responding with this post.

Still, it would take some BIG pockets, even given large denominations.

@Noflaps, Since You have red my post, I deleted it. Have no pleasure for further discussion.

Oh. Have a nice night!

@Noflaps said in #54:

Oh. Have a nice night!

Thanks, you too!

sees no flaps

mutters under breath oh god not him again

shudders and closes the tab

@Noflaps said in #50:

What straws are those, @TurtleMat? Please quote my alleged "straws."

Quoting straws? Noflaps, did you forget how one constructs a correct English sentence? coming from the one who took so much pleasure in correcting my orthography, that's quite interesting. I had to point out that this sentence of yours makes absolutely no grammatical sense. However, since I'm smarter and nicer than you, I won ́t pretend as if I didn't get it.

But since you seem to be as oblivious as you are hypocritical, I mean these points :

@Noflaps said in #47:

And yet, this cannot actually be denied:

"No, the administration has not lost "every" court case, and that's pretty easy to confirm."

@Noflaps said in #50:

Notice that NOBODY has written "No, Noflaps, you're wrong -- the administration HAS lost EVERY case."
sense.

It was easy to understand, But I gladly come down to your level, take your time to process it.
Should I explain to you how it's completely morronic and disrespectfull to insist on this completely exagerated point, intentionally deciding to try and discredit the author and the whole position even though the point was obviously "vast majority", and that it's valid? and the exaggeration doesn't make the point less valid?
For someone trying to use figures of speech on a regular basis, you sure get triggered hard when they are used slightly differently than you would have liked.
It wouldn't be so bad if you hold yourself to the same standards, but nah.

Are you so stupid that you don ́t see this? I don't think so. I think you are trying to toy with your political opponents because you have a disgusting way to go about "debate" and politics. Which is consistent with being a Rhinoceros.

@Noflaps said in #50:

Yet, the assertions about me, personally, are just distracting noise.

No. They are a necessary preliminary to any kind of sensible discussion. There is a difference between Ad-hominem attack and the implementation of accountability. You are trying to go around saying disrespectful crap and getting away with it. Well, not gonna happen.
You are the distracting noise. Which is fine, because you might actually turn more people away from the right than any leftist. So Thx I guess.

Also, you haven't adressed a single point that other have given you, so... Once again, F your demands, and F your double standards.

@Noflaps said in #50:

Instead, I'm accused of being uninformed, of grasping at straws, of playing the victim, and of cherry picking ... and so forth. Instead of getting real responses, the discussion is quickly turned toward me, personally, in a negative way.

Well, you haven't refuted any single one of these accusations. And every one of them has been substantiated by arguments and reinforced with the nonsense you write.
*There is a difference between Ad-hominem attack and the implementation of accountability. *
These are the real responses. These are the only one possible. Because no productive discussion is possible as long as you don't follow the basic rules of discussion. Which you don't.
Oh, also : see whole #45, somehow I already addressed that?

Who here is asking us to cope with hardship with toughness and without complaining?

Where is the common denominator?

@TurtleMat said in #45:

Where is the common denominator?
I won ́t do as you do and write "I'll let the reader decide" because contrary to you, I don ́t take the reader for an idiot who falls in such obvious manipulative tricks. It ́s the common denominator. The problem is you.

............................. & So ............... Here we go again >>>> How do you @Noflaps explain that in the over 1000 page Bill the wording was included that prohibits Funds for being used by the Courts vs The Trump Administration ? Defunding parts of The Judiciary when it comes to cases regarding compliance with the Law ................... ?? One Republican in a town meeting said he was inaware of this when he voted for it & at another town meeting jodi Ernst was also uninformed . These attempts to not listen for example to The Supreme Court Rulings of 7-2 & 9-0 >>>>>>>> You must be embarrassed by these attempts to elevate the Executive Branch of Government over the Judiciary & Legislative Branches . Seperation of Powers is a key to Democracy