lichess.org
Donate

Losing the game with zero mistake and zero blunders

I think it never happened to me before.
I feel like I pretty much just kept making consistently suboptimal moves. When I realized my bishop was eventually going to be trapped it was too late.

<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
This is borderline clickbait. Who or what recommended that set up? If you study the games of KFC, you might find them finger lickin' good. Games where the King's Indian Defense was played by Kasparov, Fischer, and Carlsen. That game looks like a lesser version of it. e5 and h5 here do not look positionally good for Black. I'd try Grunfeld or the Queen's Indian instead. Can you explain what this game was about? For fun or not?
@Clearchesser
How is this clickbait? I literally just wrote what happened.

My downfall was so slow that the computer analysis of lichess only signals Qd7 and Be7 as inaccuracies and nothing else.
Glad you clarified the genuine topic for me. Gawd forbid just anyone can post a game of theirs.

Your positional looks visually unsound to any GM. Your pieces have no scope in that set up. Try a normal K.I.D. Two inaccuracies are enough if your opponent plays perfect.
watch closely , moves 3 and 19 on moves list to the right marked as inaccuracies , so it means there were mistakes, your opp just played with no mistakes, can be suspecious , but whatever
btw it was rapid, so more time to think, so precise games are more possible , no wonder

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.