lichess.org
Donate

Chess.com or Lichess

@chesslegendmaster Another problem with chess.com: the forums are full of trolls. I had posted this in an earlier lichess v/s chess.com:

"
chess.com is full of trolls:
This guy areguing that 1. a4 is best by using non-chess principles: www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/1-a4-best-chess-opening2

Quite a debate over 1. e4 f6?!:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/1e4-f6
You won't believe the number of people who suggested 2... g5 after 1... f6.

Another nonsensical debate over 1. e3 where absolutely NO progress was made:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/1-e3

This 1. e4 e6 2. Qe2!? forum was going nowhere:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-french-beat-down-with-2qe2

You've got to be kidding me. Someone advocated 1. e4 b5?:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/1e4-b5

At least this went somewhere:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/1-e4-e5-2-g4
The topic? 1. e4 e5 2. g4?

Someone asked for help with 1. d4 openings. Look at what happened:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/good-defense-against-1-d4
Do you even call that help? Lichess is WAY better, especially with the incredibly helpful playerbase.

At least they know how to create a bongcloud opening book:
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/bongcloud-opening-book

And finally, blabbermouths with the fried fox attack (1. f3 e5 2. Kf2):
www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/the-fried-fox-attack-1f3-2kf2

I just can't stop laughing when I read these forums. The trolling is beyond crazy...

Conclusion: Lichess is better."

This is the link to that forum post: lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/lichessorg-or-chesscom?page=7#68

I've played on chess .com and that was a disaster. I couldn't find the controls!
I find lichess muuuuch better,.I keep a chess.com account so I can try out new openings and fool around since I only truly care about my lichess rating since its my main website.
I like lichess but I don t like they use external fonts ( I can t see them , I see bad caracters)

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.