Loser • page 1/1 • Lichess Feedback • lichess.org

Warum gibt es keine Loser-Variante, sondern nur Antichess?

I was expecting something diff. from the title :P

Losing chess (or Antichess, Giveaway chess, Suicide chess, Killer chess, Take-all chess, Take-me chess, Reverse chess): Capturing moves are mandatory and the objective is to lose all one's pieces. There is no check; the king is captured like an ordinary piece.

Looks like we have a lot of variants to add. Luckly, only the name is diffrent? Maybe Take-me chess is the most accurate name

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_variants

I was expecting something diff. from the title :P >Losing chess (or Antichess, Giveaway chess, Suicide chess, Killer chess, Take-all chess, Take-me chess, Reverse chess): Capturing moves are mandatory and the objective is to lose all one's pieces. There is no check; the king is captured like an ordinary piece. Looks like we have a lot of variants to add. Luckly, only the name is diffrent? Maybe Take-me chess is the most accurate name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_variants

nadjarostowa

There are a couple of very similar variants. But providing several of them on a server doesn't seem to add much value.

echodaisy

Seems like a case of "we don't want all the features" — https://lichess.org/@/thibault/blog/we-dont-want-all-the-features/q3nOzv4n

Variants make up a fairly small number of games played on lichess, adding another one probably isn't a priority.

Seems like a case of "we don't want all the features" — https://lichess.org/@/thibault/blog/we-dont-want-all-the-features/q3nOzv4n Variants make up a fairly small number of games played on lichess, adding another one probably isn't a priority.