Recently I have a group of players wish them to learn by tournament beginning with a particular position done by editing a board.
Though I suggest the following
should be a must unrated tournament.
a player should play one game with white and then with the same player with black.
copy paste facilitation.
Thank you alot.
Recently I have a group of players wish them to learn by tournament beginning with a particular position done by editing a board.
Though I suggest the following
>should be a must unrated tournament.
>a player should play one game with white and then with the same player with black.
>copy paste facilitation.
Thank you alot.
@MohammedElasha #1 Yes, I have also been thinking about this on several occasions. I don't think the coding is a problem, the main problem is that people could set it for a completely winning position for either side, and people would join without acknowledging what position it is set to. Aside from that, I think it would be a very helpful feature to add!
Cheers from Prague!
@MohammedElasha #1 Yes, I have also been thinking about this on several occasions. I don't think the coding is a problem, the main problem is that people could set it for a completely winning position for either side, and people would join without acknowledging what position it is set to. Aside from that, I think it would be a very helpful feature to add!
Cheers from Prague!
@mysterious_expert
Thank you for the support.
@mysterious_expert
Thank you for the support.
سهلة يا محمد
@Obay-Sudan
حبيبنا أوبي صحيح يمكن عمل بطولات بافتتاحيات محدده ،،كما يمكنك اللعب مع صديقك من بوزشن معين اندقيم كان او ميد،،
بس
اتمنى يضيفو لنا خاصية انو يمكن عمل بطولات من بوزشن معين ،، بغض النظر عن خواص البوزشن فوز كان او خساره،، وكان ذالك الطلب للأغراض التعليميه او التدريبيه.
@Obay-Sudan
حبيبنا أوبي صحيح يمكن عمل بطولات بافتتاحيات محدده ،،كما يمكنك اللعب مع صديقك من بوزشن معين اندقيم كان او ميد،،
بس
اتمنى يضيفو لنا خاصية انو يمكن عمل بطولات من بوزشن معين ،، بغض النظر عن خواص البوزشن فوز كان او خساره،، وكان ذالك الطلب للأغراض التعليميه او التدريبيه.
@mysterious_expert You could set it so you're either forced to give both the same position or it has to be from -0.2 to +0.2
@mysterious_expert You could set it so you're either forced to give both the same position or it has to be from -0.2 to +0.2
@RubyChessPiec
Ok I see what you mean.
But that restrict alot of rich positions.
I want to train sme people technical play so their moves become more precise.
eg. Bishop and Knight versus alone king
U know the 50 move rule can cause sm problems with players under time pressure.
So precision in needed so far.
Thank you and I appreciate your idea it can be helpful during setting up a board.
@RubyChessPiec
Ok I see what you mean.
But that restrict alot of rich positions.
I want to train sme people technical play so their moves become more precise.
eg. Bishop and Knight versus alone king
U know the 50 move rule can cause sm problems with players under time pressure.
So precision in needed so far.
Thank you and I appreciate your idea it can be helpful during setting up a board.
@MohammedElasha "bishop and knight versus alone king" will be impossible for one person to win, unless they stalemate which they cant force.
@MohammedElasha "bishop and knight versus alone king" will be impossible for one person to win, unless they stalemate which they cant force.
@RubyChessPiec I agree with Mohammed. That requirement for -0.2 to +0.2 would restrict lots of positions. Imagine if you are a coach and want your students to play from a certain position which is winning for one of the sides.
@RubyChessPiec I agree with Mohammed. That requirement for -0.2 to +0.2 would restrict lots of positions. Imagine if you are a coach and want your students to play from a certain position which is winning for one of the sides.
@mysterious_expert actually now that i think aobut it, i agree... you could up it to somewhere like -2 to +2 or something else
@mysterious_expert actually now that i think aobut it, i agree... you could up it to somewhere like -2 to +2 or something else