<Comment deleted by user>
Why does the computer tell he Englund Gambit a blunder?
If you deleted your original comment because you thought it didnt make sense grammatically, then i believe your comment should be "Why does the engine recognize the Englund Gambit as a blunder?"
Honestly, I don't know, but I think it's just that engines dont really like opening sacrifices, especially when the move isn't really developing and there are many counterplays to it.
Anyway, congrats on absolutely memeing a CM
Honestly, I don't know, but I think it's just that engines dont really like opening sacrifices, especially when the move isn't really developing and there are many counterplays to it.
Anyway, congrats on absolutely memeing a CM
@shepbox said in #3:
> If you deleted your original comment because you thought it didnt make sense grammatically, then i believe your comment should be "Why does the engine recognize the Englund Gambit as a blunder?"
>
> Honestly, I don't know, but I think it's just that engines dont really like opening sacrifices, especially when the move isn't really developing and there are many counterplays to it.
>
> Anyway, congrats on absolutely memeing a CM
Thanks shepbox
> If you deleted your original comment because you thought it didnt make sense grammatically, then i believe your comment should be "Why does the engine recognize the Englund Gambit as a blunder?"
>
> Honestly, I don't know, but I think it's just that engines dont really like opening sacrifices, especially when the move isn't really developing and there are many counterplays to it.
>
> Anyway, congrats on absolutely memeing a CM
Thanks shepbox
This seems like a Grammarly lesson -_-
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.