- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

debate

#1

Let's do a a debate on "Madness of the Multiverse: Truth or Just Sci-Fi?"

My point:
I think multiverse do exist as sometimes we feel like we lived that moment before but have no idea when. It can be possible that we experienced that in a different universe.

NOTE: No hatred to anyone, Just share your opinions respectfully.

Let's do a a debate on "Madness of the Multiverse: Truth or Just Sci-Fi?" My point: I think multiverse do exist as sometimes we feel like we lived that moment before but have no idea when. It can be possible that we experienced that in a different universe. NOTE: No hatred to anyone, Just share your opinions respectfully.
#3

Like Deja Vu and the "Mandela effect", some attribute these to similar memories cropping up in certain circumstances , making one think they've been there before, and the other, remembering the past incorrectly, personally i don't know what to believe. :).

Like Deja Vu and the "Mandela effect", some attribute these to similar memories cropping up in certain circumstances , making one think they've been there before, and the other, remembering the past incorrectly, personally i don't know what to believe. :).
#5

There are many explanations for déjà vu.

One simply posists a glitch in my brain cells.

Another posits the existence of a full alternate universe, with all its billions of stars fueled by nuclear fusion and its billions if solar systems and its billions of galaxies and clusters of galaxies obeying the Einstein equations, and its billions of billions of bosons and hadrons tirelessly racing through the universe at nearly the speed of light and its quarks doing their quark businesses, and, remarkably enough, this alternate universe also has a world which is similar enough to ours for there to be a "copy" of myself, but still different enough to explain the "fake memories". And what's more, we can't communicate with this alternate universe, except in some rare random occasions when our brain (of all things) is able to receive some glimpse from it.

I can't decide which sounds the most plausible.

There are many explanations for *déjà vu*. One simply posists a glitch in my brain cells. Another posits the existence of a full alternate universe, with all its billions of stars fueled by nuclear fusion and its billions if solar systems and its billions of galaxies and clusters of galaxies obeying the Einstein equations, and its billions of billions of bosons and hadrons tirelessly racing through the universe at nearly the speed of light and its quarks doing their quark businesses, and, remarkably enough, this alternate universe also has a world which is similar enough to ours for there to be a "copy" of myself, but still different enough to explain the "fake memories". And what's more, we can't communicate with this alternate universe, except in some rare random occasions when our brain (of all things) is able to receive some glimpse from it. I can't decide which sounds the most plausible.
#6

@CoffeeBeanKiller

I don't have any braincells though, so I think the second one is likely more plausible.

@CoffeeBeanKiller I don't have any braincells though, so I think the second one is likely more plausible.
#7

@chesspanda6 said in #6:

I don't have any braincells though, so I think the second one is likely more plausible.

Makes total sense.

@chesspanda6 said in #6: > I don't have any braincells though, so I think the second one is likely more plausible. Makes total sense.
#8

i don't really care what the real answer is but a multiverse sounds cool so hope that's true :D

i don't really care what the real answer is but a multiverse sounds cool so hope that's true :D
#9

@IS_123

It depends upon which multiverse you refer to.

The theory tt the universe splits at every decision point ? Seems needlessly complicated, Occams razor,the principal of parsimony . The simplest explanation may often prove correct. It seems like endless multiplication to me though there are quantum implications.
Ofc there is the bubble universe theory which at first seems reasonable but still is a part within the whole.

Well tts my opinion
Though I'm sure it won't be
Universally
Accepted.

@IS_123 It depends upon which multiverse you refer to. The theory tt the universe splits at every decision point ? Seems needlessly complicated, Occams razor,the principal of parsimony . The simplest explanation may often prove correct. It seems like endless multiplication to me though there are quantum implications. Ofc there is the bubble universe theory which at first seems reasonable but still is a part within the whole. Well tts my opinion Though I'm sure it won't be Universally Accepted.
#10

@Dukedog said in #9:

The theory tt the universe splits at every decision point ? Seems needlessly complicated, Occams razor,the principal of parsimony .

I'm not sure it's actually complicated though. It is very simple to describe, even though it possibly entails vast numbers of universes (maybe infinite). It seems to be the only satisfactory explanation of randomness, if randomness exists. If there is only one universe and yet there are multiple possible paths that universe can follow, that seems almost absurd to me. The other option (which I think is the simplest) is that randomness doesn't exist at all, and what we perceive as randomness is merely chaos.

@Dukedog said in #9: > The theory tt the universe splits at every decision point ? Seems needlessly complicated, Occams razor,the principal of parsimony . I'm not sure it's actually complicated though. It is very simple to describe, even though it possibly entails vast numbers of universes (maybe infinite). It seems to be the only satisfactory explanation of randomness, if randomness exists. If there is only one universe and yet there are multiple possible paths that universe can follow, that seems almost absurd to me. The other option (which I think is the simplest) is that randomness doesn't exist at all, and what we perceive as randomness is merely chaos.