@Sarg0n
> No, the (defending) player has to show the defense and if he has no time for that it is at his expense.
> The winner-on-time has to show nothing, he is just playing.
Are you answering to me? If so, do not understand your logic at all.
> No, the (defending) player has to show the defense and if he has no time for that it is at his expense.
> The winner-on-time has to show nothing, he is just playing.
Are you answering to me? If so, do not understand your logic at all.