@JM3000 said in #30:
>
@Ecamvelo a dit dans le #27 :
>
>
>
> 100 tricheurs en 130 parties. C'est difficile à croire. Je suis simplement 2100 joueur national d'un pays européen et je gagne un pourcentage raisonnable de parties dans Lichess (et
chess.com ) sans tricher. Il est évident que les jeux que je gagne ne sont pas contre les tricheurs car les tricheurs me détruisent. Parmi les parties que j'ai perdues, beaucoup sont du fair-play de la part de mon adversaire et seul un petit pourcentage est de type tricheur ou suspect. Mon opinion est que les tricheurs représentent entre 3 et 8 % du total.
You are elo 2100, i am 1199 irl (no game yet) and 1500 on lichess. On another site i am 1000 elo, i target this website, no lichess. Why this differente ? It's a begin of explain but they propose a classement (division et somethings like that), Lichess no then player want up. You stay in bad level but you make a big volume of game , i wanted play the division for the challenge then last week i checked someones with more 400 games in 1 week but no up or no down his elo (what is the probability for a honnesty player to make as much as game and no amend his elo but be on of first in division).
For answer at your rate : 8% of cheats of total. Yes but it's specific "zone" if not i have never seen under 30% in every game i played.
I call cheater player who use an advantage forbidden. In chess, a player who use his tablet/phone for see the best step while he is playing on the computer is a cheater. Use a macro/program is a cheater (i incluse a lot of thing, that explain also why i write a big percent).
Yesterday i played against an opponent during close 1h30, i loved the game, you see he try to build his plan, how defend (once 15 min for a step) and it was a true pleasure to play like that. Unfortunaly it's too rarely at my low level.