I played a game, and after the match i watch the analyzation.
The match can be found here: hu.lichess.org/study/eV0jZvXm
I have two question, i guess they are dumb, but i am a beginner. So first of all, after the second step (d5) it said i should have hit the pawn (xd5). Why is it better? I guess he will just kill it with the queen (xd5), and i will lose place in middle.
However the move i absolutely dont understand is at turn 6, where i move my bishop to G2. The analytic sad the correct move would be H3. I have been thinking about this for 20 minutes, and i cant figure out why that is good. He will just simply kill it with his bishop, and i dont gain anything. Why is that a better move?
Thanks!
The match can be found here: hu.lichess.org/study/eV0jZvXm
I have two question, i guess they are dumb, but i am a beginner. So first of all, after the second step (d5) it said i should have hit the pawn (xd5). Why is it better? I guess he will just kill it with the queen (xd5), and i will lose place in middle.
However the move i absolutely dont understand is at turn 6, where i move my bishop to G2. The analytic sad the correct move would be H3. I have been thinking about this for 20 minutes, and i cant figure out why that is good. He will just simply kill it with his bishop, and i dont gain anything. Why is that a better move?
Thanks!