@newlinkwave , I read English well. Indeed, I have been an editor, professionally. And I am ridiculously over-educated.
Here is a cut-and-paste quote of what YOU recently typed: "Please read my comment again. If you don't understand English well, then use a translator (I recommend DeepL). What I said is that before "agreeing" or not with something, do some research."
But what did you ACTUALLY type even BEFORE that? Here's another quote, in pertinent part, from one of your other posts: "... but don't say you don't agree with something without a bit of research."
In other words, as I previously noted, correctly, you didn't merely tell me what I could "agree" with -- you outright tried to tell me what I could "say." My reading is accurate, and I can cut-and-paste just fine.
In any event, I must, apparently, repeat myself: I HAVE done some research, as I described expressly. So telling me, condescendingly, to "do some research" simply ignores what I said.
I'm sure you can find a "youtube" that suggests how cheating is "possible." No doubt cheating is "possible." So what? It doesn't appear to be widespread here, at least at the faster time control that I almost exclusively play.
In actual practice, HERE, based on my own numerous, repeated checks of my ACTUAL games over a period of YEARS, I have apparently NOT encountered cheating. Which means, regardless of how many "youtubes" you find that show HOW to cheat, or that cheating is "possible," the practice doesn't seem to be of a great deal of practical moment HERE, at least not at the faster time controls that I have played.
Can you find SOME cheating here? I suppose. They do, after all, deal with offenders from time to time. But is cheating a terribly widespread, common practice here? That has not been my ACTUAL experience, over YEARS. Which I am entitled to say without being insulted.
Let me quote what I said at the beginning of all this:
"I fear the possibility of some form of "cheating" at slow time controls. But at blitz? Or even more so, at bullet? Naaaahhhh."
I didn't say cheating was not possible. I said I DIDN'T FEAR THE POSSIBILITY of cheating at faster time controls here. Because I don't. Since I have YET to encounter cheating, the possibility that I "might" encounter it sometime, because it's "possible," does not cause me concern. I don't fear it.
At this site and at another site, I have sometimes (although of course rarely) had people accuse ME of "being a bot" just because I played a particularly good game and their egos apparently couldn''t handle the loss -- so they accused me of being a "bot." It was laughable -- but they were just CERTAIN. I, of course, know rather intimately that I am not a "bot." Bots don't own dogs and ride bicycles or make a good burrito. At least not yet.
You can be disagree with me, and hope to be informative, without being rude. But telling me what I may "say," or snidely suggesting that I might not understand English, is not only laughable, it is unnecessarily rude.
However, I forgive you. We all sometimes would like to be able to reword something, in retrospect.
