I have a feeling.

I am not a good chess player, I am actually so bad, that it lowers the level of play of my opponents, and as I progressively "improve" my opponents just start playing worse and worse for their level. I mean half of my game analysis look like stock market graphs.

And yet the Lichess statistical summaries suggest one who is better than 96.5% of Blitz , 97.0% of Rapid, 96.8% of Classical and 88.6% of Bullet players. Many would envy such figures.

@Davelz said in #2:
> And yet the Lichess statistical summaries suggest one who is better than 96.5% of Blitz , 97.0% of Rapid, 96.8% of Classical and 88.6% of Bullet players. Many would envy such figures.

My presence makes 97% of players play worse than me.

P.S-In case it wasn't clear, this is a joke post.

Dude, your ratings are many others' dreams. Just train harder and smarter.

HOW ARE YOU A BAD PLAYER LOOK AT MINES AND REPEAT IT...
AND WHAT ABOUT THIS!?
2095
2154
2161
2102
1624?
-
-
-
.......