@lurarose #6
Lurarose, you are perfectly right of course, and your reply would make perfect sense if I actually had asserted what you are tackling ;-)
I am not sure about the name of this fallacy right now...
I can't see the point in assuming that nobody is cheating, as you are proposing. It would simply deny reality. However, you got a point in not being too quick in accusing of cheating. But the same holds for accusing someone of just excusing a loss...
Actually, it is not the rating loss versus cheaters that worries me. In contrast, it might be a good training session. But if the result of a match is determined already, the fun is out of it, somehow...
The density of detected cheaters would be very interesting. Is that information available`?
Could be interesting to verify one's gut feeling about that. My guess would be around 5%.
We can call it the "Rotten Morale Index" :-)
Lurarose, you are perfectly right of course, and your reply would make perfect sense if I actually had asserted what you are tackling ;-)
I am not sure about the name of this fallacy right now...
I can't see the point in assuming that nobody is cheating, as you are proposing. It would simply deny reality. However, you got a point in not being too quick in accusing of cheating. But the same holds for accusing someone of just excusing a loss...
Actually, it is not the rating loss versus cheaters that worries me. In contrast, it might be a good training session. But if the result of a match is determined already, the fun is out of it, somehow...
The density of detected cheaters would be very interesting. Is that information available`?
Could be interesting to verify one's gut feeling about that. My guess would be around 5%.
We can call it the "Rotten Morale Index" :-)