Was World War 2 necessary? (Like Americans joining the war?)

@greenteakitten said ^

@Rage698

Okay at this point you're just ragebaiting me with strawmen but it just so happens that I'll be cramming for history exams tomorrow...so you can get your response then, complete with screenshots of the official curriculum :)

Straw men, rage, baiting, wow. What an accusation., you don’t care about the 3 million people that died. Due to the Bengal famine, if the truth is a straw man argument, And you guys can just use, whatever others did to justify your wrong. How immoral is that?, It’s not an exclamation., just tell me how immoral is that?

"fascism did not result from socialism"

• It did, both in Italy and in Germany.

"Hitler did not win the election "from" the socialists and communists."

• Election 1933:
  Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei: 288 seats,
  Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands: 120 seats,
  Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands: 81 seats,
  Deutsche Zentrumspartei: 73 seats, etc.

"Hindenburg did not have to nominate Hitler"

• There was no other way to form a government. He had to.

"the British could have prevented the war"

• Yes, the British and the Americans should have rejected the harsh terms imposed by Jean de Lattre de Tassigny.
  On the other hand, the French had experienced two wars by Germany: 1870 and 1914-1918.

Alright, since Point number three, is quite personal, I won’t answer it, since it is not related as well, but .4, do you really think colonisation is not demonic, trillions of dollars were taken from India by the British, and this is just an example, what did the British give in return, just a railway system that we paid for.
And do you think Decolonisation is not angelic, Vietnam fought for 20 years, against, some of the most powerful empires of history, and still somehow won, just because they wanted to get free of colonisation, they worked this hard.
That is strawmen according to you, right green tea, Kitchen.
This is not ragebaiting
This is to say World War II was never necessary, it was caused by the allies, alongside Hitler, and they dragged us with it, and in return our country got divided by the good heroes.

I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand.

@nomen-nudum said ^

II) Despite the stereotypes, America is very much the second best when it comes to being transparent about our ugly history right behind Germany.

Ah, the usual "we in America are the best, even though y'all are too stupid to see it" (conceding to only be "second best" in that instance doesn't change much the self-centred attitude).

We are expected to solve problems with our superpower might

More of the same mentality. No, you are not expected to "solve problems", except for your own problems of course. The only people who think that America is expected to "solve problems" for the world are Americans themselves. In fact most of the world would be very happy if the US didn't try to "solve their problems" for them.

I’m exhausted with the fact that no other country is yelled at on the Internet to the degree that America is

Firstly that's not true: China, Russia, Iran, Israel... But also no other country has as much power as the US, and it's absolutely normal that the more powerful receive more criticism.
Yes, this is the decisive point, you guys think America is the best, green tea kitchen, now let me expose the truth about America, and yes, Americans are saying this, as well.

@tpr said ^

"fascism did not result from socialism"

• It did, both in Italy and in Germany.

It didn't. The fact that the nazi party name has "socialist" in it does not mean they were actually socialist in any way. As someone else pointed out it's like saying the Democratic Republic of North Korea is a democracy. Historically, the nazis are coming from the Freikorps, with Hitler adding an extra layer of antisemitism.

Similarly, the fact that Mussolini was at first a member of the socialist party doesn't mean socialism resulted in fascism. Mussolini later changed his mind. If you don't believe that, you should have a look at how socialists were treated under Mussolini's regime. And the fact that you resorted to use Mussolini's first names as a way to prove he was a socialist is so beyond ludicrous that it's laughable.

"Hitler did not win the election "from" the socialists and communists."

• Election 1933:
  Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei: 288 seats,
  Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands: 120 seats,
  Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands: 81 seats,
  Deutsche Zentrumspartei: 73 seats, etc.

Ok so he won it against the socialists and communists. Saying he won it from them seems to imply they helped him winning the election.

You think, I am saying anti-American propaganda, right,
Well, let me tell you, the state of America.
It is the most powerful country in the world
It has the best economy
, Wow, so good so impressive
Now let me tell you the negative points,
The white Americans were migrants who deported thousand of native Americans
Slavery was legal until 1865
Now for the recent times, negative points
Brainrot is rotting the minds of American children
The religious right is an extremist group, which promotes violence.
People are literally selling stuff for the rapture
Fruit love Island is trending, which is an AI show
There are more

@Rage698 said ^

I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand.

visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too.

‘This is rage baiting ‘
When the truth come out, the allies fan just have to say, this right, really green tea kitchen
You have rage,baited me.