Blunder?!?! Not really • page 1/1 • Lichess Feedback • lichess.org

LDFerrer_2009_Rizal

In this game:

https://lichess.org/PQtdAbK1/white#31

Stockfish says move 16 Qh5 was a blunder. it says that g6 was better for forced checkmate in 4. But Qh5 is also a forced checkmate in 4. I would like to remove the blunder. Thanks

In this game: https://lichess.org/PQtdAbK1/white#31 Stockfish says move 16 Qh5 was a blunder. it says that g6 was better for forced checkmate in 4. But Qh5 is also a forced checkmate in 4. I would like to remove the blunder. Thanks

MentalFugues

#2

Huh, so actually it's the computer analysis that blundered.

Passionate_Player

#3

The funny thing is that when I open the analysis suggests Qh5+ and then shows it as a blunder

LDFerrer_2009_Rizal

#4

I need help. Mods please change it (if you can)

TheLuckyBrain edited

#5

@LDFerrer_2009_Rizal from what i know from stockfish is that it computes the possibility of shortest possible mate .. i.e here - g6 , kh6 ( if he plays this ), qh3#... which is shorter than the other sequence of qh5+, kg8 , g6 , qh7#.. this is stockfish and thus cannot really be changed by lichess.

LordSupremeChess

#6

@MentalFugues said in #2:

Huh, so actually it's the computer analysis that blundered.
So the computer is a blunder??

@MentalFugues said in #2: > Huh, so actually it's the computer analysis that blundered. So the computer is a blunder??

corvusmellori

#7

Lichess server analysis runs stockfish at a very low depth for each move. For whatever reason, stockfish wasn't able to see the mate after 16. Qh5+, and scored it +6.1. +6.1, while still completely winning, is much worse than mate, so lichess sees that the implied winning chances for white have decreased, and labels the move a blunder.

The server analysis won't be changed, nor will the move annotation, but don't let it bother you! You know it wasn't a blunder, which is the important thing.

Lichess server analysis runs stockfish at a very low depth for each move. For whatever reason, stockfish wasn't able to see the mate after 16. Qh5+, and scored it +6.1. +6.1, while still completely winning, is much worse than mate, so lichess sees that the implied winning chances for white have decreased, and labels the move a blunder. The server analysis won't be changed, nor will the move annotation, but don't let it bother you! You know it wasn't a blunder, which is the important thing.