- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Meet ChessAgine

#2

Some great progress! Have had fun testing it and look forward to doing more testing soon.

Some great progress! Have had fun testing it and look forward to doing more testing soon.
#4

@krithin317 said in #3:

Can u add guest mode @Noobmasterplayer123???

Yes, I can add it, since it's in beta testing, it isn't fully open to non-auth users, but eventually it will have guest mode like Lichess

@krithin317 said in #3: > Can u add guest mode @Noobmasterplayer123??? Yes, I can add it, since it's in beta testing, it isn't fully open to non-auth users, but eventually it will have guest mode like Lichess
#5

amazing job! I love that you can ask ChessAgine to assess a position and have it talk about abstract elements like space, pawn structure, etc.

I couldn't "talk to the engine" until now

I wonder how "deep" the analysis is.. i.e. can it explain concepts that are useful up to the 1500 level? 2000 level and beyond?

Again, great work

amazing job! I love that you can ask ChessAgine to assess a position and have it talk about abstract elements like space, pawn structure, etc. I couldn't "talk to the engine" until now I wonder how "deep" the analysis is.. i.e. can it explain concepts that are useful up to the 1500 level? 2000 level and beyond? Again, great work
#6

I tried to try it out but all I got was "Sorry, there was an error processing your message. Please try again.". What could be causing this? I used the suggested prompts in an opening position.

I tried to try it out but all I got was "Sorry, there was an error processing your message. Please try again.". What could be causing this? I used the suggested prompts in an opening position.
#7

@HelloItsDmitri said in #6:

I tried to try it out but all I got was "Sorry, there was an error processing your message. Please try again.". What could be causing this? I used the suggested prompts in an opening position.

did you set up your API key? Also what model and provider did you use?

@HelloItsDmitri said in #6: > I tried to try it out but all I got was "Sorry, there was an error processing your message. Please try again.". What could be causing this? I used the suggested prompts in an opening position. did you set up your API key? Also what model and provider did you use?
#8

@retickulous said in #5:

amazing job! I love that you can ask ChessAgine to assess a position and have it talk about abstract elements like space, pawn structure, etc.

I couldn't "talk to the engine" until now

I wonder how "deep" the analysis is.. i.e. can it explain concepts that are useful up to the 1500 level? 2000 level and beyond?

Again, great work

Right now, it provides a general level of explanation, as I said in a blog, it won't talk at a GM or master, I wouldn't give a rating to chessAgine since its in very early beta, but I can say its somewhere greater than 1500 or 1600 because it evals the position by following past GM frameworks and as you said can detect abstract chess themes. Again its very hard to give it a rating.

@retickulous said in #5: > amazing job! I love that you can ask ChessAgine to assess a position and have it talk about abstract elements like space, pawn structure, etc. > > I couldn't "talk to the engine" until now > > I wonder how "deep" the analysis is.. i.e. can it explain concepts that are useful up to the 1500 level? 2000 level and beyond? > > Again, great work Right now, it provides a general level of explanation, as I said in a blog, it won't talk at a GM or master, I wouldn't give a rating to chessAgine since its in very early beta, but I can say its somewhere greater than 1500 or 1600 because it evals the position by following past GM frameworks and as you said can detect abstract chess themes. Again its very hard to give it a rating.
#9

@Noobmasterplayer123 said in #8:

Right now, it provides a general level of explanation, as I said in a blog, it won't talk at a GM or master level, I wouldn't give a rating to chessAgine since its in very early beta, but I can say its somewhere greater than 1500 or 1600 because it evals the position by following past GM frameworks and as you said can detect abstract chess themes. Again, its very hard to give it a rating.

@Noobmasterplayer123 said in #8: > Right now, it provides a general level of explanation, as I said in a blog, it won't talk at a GM or master level, I wouldn't give a rating to chessAgine since its in very early beta, but I can say its somewhere greater than 1500 or 1600 because it evals the position by following past GM frameworks and as you said can detect abstract chess themes. Again, its very hard to give it a rating.
#10

in terms of depth, it doesn't evaluate at the depth of position like an engine, but rather top level. If you want to explore a position on the GUI, you would have to play it on the board. Though I'm working on the Claude extension and Claude is able to go deeper, more to come in my next blog on updates on that

in terms of depth, it doesn't evaluate at the depth of position like an engine, but rather top level. If you want to explore a position on the GUI, you would have to play it on the board. Though I'm working on the Claude extension and Claude is able to go deeper, more to come in my next blog on updates on that